jstanley

13 ms·

301.
by jstanley 7mo ago
Right, that's why you need further assumptions on x in order for that simplification to hold.
302.
by jstanley 7mo ago
The fad lasting millions of years is "eat what you can get, what is fibre?"
303.
by jstanley 7mo ago
> eat what you like and be sure to get a lot of fiber each day Sure sounds like another fad diet.
304.
by jstanley 7mo ago
That won't help. 1.) Rendering pages is table stakes for an AI headless browser tool, and 2.) most of the LLM comments probably come from copy and pasting to ChatGPT, not from autonomous agents.
305.
by jstanley 8mo ago
The same is true of standards.
306.
by jstanley 8mo ago
Adding a new feature to unify existing features is perfectly isomorphic to defining a new standard to unify existing standards.
307.
by jstanley 8mo ago
> “I’m Feeling Lucky” intelligence is optimized for arrival, not for becoming. You get the answer but nothing else (keep in mind we are assuming that it's a good answer). You don’t learn how ideas fight, mutate, or die. You don’t de
308.
by jstanley 8mo ago
https://xkcd.com/927/
309.
by jstanley 8mo ago
There is definitely bloat. A few months ago I was messing about with making a QWERTY piano in a web page, and it was utterly unplayable due to the bloat-induced latency in between the fingers and the ears.
310.
by jstanley 8mo ago
I think the problem is overstated. People always learn the things they need to learn. Were people clutching their pearls about how programmers were going to lack the fundamentals of assembly language after compilers came along? Probably, bu
311.
by jstanley 8mo ago
No it wasn't. That's the exact point I'm refuting. If you don't think voting with your wallet works, then that is a position you can take. But you can't think it works when buying from the OEM but doesn't work
312.
by jstanley 8mo ago
My impression of mistakes was that they were an indicator of someone who was doing a lot of work. They're not necessarily making mistakes at a higher rate per unit of work, they just do more of both per unit of time. From that perspect
313.
by jstanley 8mo ago
> If anything there fast reduction in value makes them less attractive. Right. And if you buy a secondhand one you are increasing their value on the secondhand market. Reducing the depreciation increases the value of the brand new phone.
314.
by jstanley 8mo ago
But if you think buying on the secondhand market doesn't impact the market, why do you think buying from the OEM does? It's one phone's worth of demand either way.
315.
by jstanley 8mo ago
Well then buying them directly from Google would have no effect either.
316.
by jstanley 8mo ago
Did I miss it or is there no link to try this out? EDIT: (Also, watching the video... "How do you find out if someone worked at Google?" "Don't worry, they'll let you know")
317.
by jstanley 8mo ago
We do sort of have that with the capabilities stuff (although I admit hardly anyone knows how to use it). But the tricky part is that "reading files" is done all the time in ways you might not think of as "reading files"
318.
by jstanley 8mo ago
> every single extension provides 100% access to my websites to whoever controls the extension. But the browser also has 100% access to all of the websites. The browser is software that works for you. You control the browser. Who but you
319.
by jstanley 8mo ago
He's counting out like 6 at a time. He needs a fast way to pick small quantities precisely, not a fast way to check large quantities. Once they're picked they're easily verified by eye.
320.
by jstanley 8mo ago
I don't think your example refutes the fairness heuristic at all. The first case is completely fair because anybody else could have done the same thing without any special access required. The second case is unfair because you had to w
321.
by jstanley 8mo ago
How should he have acted instead?
322.
Ask HN: Are you running an anti-detect headless browser?
1 points by jstanley 8mo ago|0 comments
323.
by jstanley 8mo ago
Because the people who are consistently right will consistently win money and will make bigger bets which move the price more, in the limit case making the price converge on the true probability of the outcome. This is the theoretical under
324.
by jstanley 8mo ago
How would you find out if you were wrong? You're presented with hundreds of people that prove you wrong, and your response is "no, I assume I'm right"?
325.
Show HN: ChatJimmy Ultra (100k+ tokens/sec)(incoherency.co.uk)
1 points by jstanley 8mo ago|0 comments
326.
by jstanley 8mo ago
This is an unnecessarily cynical view. People are excited about AI because it's new powerful technology. They aren't "pandering" to anyone.
327.
My journey to the microwave alternate timeline(lesswrong.com)
385 points by jstanley 8mo ago|191 comments
328.
by jstanley 8mo ago
This is nothing to do with politicians.
329.
by jstanley 8mo ago
Roger. And cool project btw.
330.
by jstanley 8mo ago
I don't think hosting the site behind Cloudflare will affect the number of SSH brute-force attempts, these bots are just brute-forcing the entire IPv4 space aren't they?

More ›