Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jsight
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
To be fair, a lot of people right now would willingly pay $5k for the features that are available now, especially if they spend a lot of time on long highway trips.
62.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
Notably, SAE level 5 is actually well below the standard that you've laid out here. The vehicle simply has to be able to make itself safe in situations that it can't handle. This allows room for remote assistance or a human takeov
63.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
Even without FSD, the basic AutoPilot uses the same sensors and vision stack for TACC, collision warnings, and collision avoidance.
64.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
Yeah, the FSD promises are old and annoying. For some of us, we remember the ridiculous claims starting back in at least 2016. I agree with you that noone should buy this car because of "FSD".
65.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
Checklists like that make things sound much worse than they are. Common issues are really minor compared to the things listed there. And, tbh, hang around some forums for the company that has been "doing right since the Model T" a
66.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
That was basically what I was thinking as well. There's a reason that Mobileye's camera only solutions tend to have a lot more cameras than Tesla does. Stereoscopic vision would be a big help, and tesla only has it in some directi
67.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
Hmm, not sure if I agree with that. I think the best panels back in 2000 were ~11% efficient. Today we are closer to ~24%? I mean, it isn't a fast improvement, but production for a given area has more than doubled in 20 years. And 11%
68.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
I think you can still do something similar with headunit reloaded. It might be a little more complex to setup, though.
69.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
Isn't the answer obvious? Because doing otherwise involves a lot more work, and people choose the easier path.
70.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
He posted the video. The car was driving straight towards the gravel, so if he had done nothing it would have hit it directly. His response was in the right direction, but was a little too late.
71.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
> And if one of them had physical temperature knobs and a small centre screen, id choose it regardless of the price difference. Get a Mach-E. It has physical controls! Oh, wait, its just a volume knob. I don't know why noone uses ph
72.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
> The secret sauce ingredient is the idle battery life. The Android devices I used -- all 13 of them, without exception -- routinely lost anywhere from 15% to 40% battery when I was out and about without me picking them up even once. I t
73.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
> The vaccination campaign was always going to be a failure. The vaccinated half of the population is faring much better than the unvaccinated half. How can you call that a failure? Getting to that state was the goal of the earlier prote
74.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
Unfortunately it hasn't shown resounding efficacy at preventing reinfection or enough breakthrough infections to keep feeding variants. Even with perfect coverage, its likely we'd still have delta and future variants too. This isn
75.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
I don't think its fair to say your are speaking in bad faith either. I had similar experiences with some older devices (Nexus One, Galaxy S2, etc). There was a long period of time when Android devices were really bad on battery, even w
76.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
> I am only saying that back in 2017 -- when I finally lost patience with Android -- things were looking pretty bad for it and for me that was the tipping point that made go for iPhones. I'll respond to your earlier post too, but th
77.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
> which is quite justified by the way, I am using iPhones for 4 years now and they've consistently won over any of the 13 Android devices that I've used in the years before (and sometimes during). I find this a bit shocking. We
78.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
Because they were afraid that they'd be here for the long term, and didn't want to tolerate that? Articles like this just confirm those fears.
79.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
I feel like there is a strong possibility that the sources vary. Possibly even some of them aren't so edible. How else could it have been readily available for decades without a clear source being well known?
80.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
https://archive.is/u4D8H
81.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
I see that happening too, but tbh, I see it happening even without evidence. Its almost like some weird form of "thinking for yourself", but taken to the point of rejecting any evidence that doesn't match the preconceived not
82.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
You aren't kidding, I'm also seeing a trend of people claiming that any information that doesn't match their viewpoint must be faked or dishonest.
83.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
GM SuperCruise right now, and Ford is claiming that their "Blue Cruise" product will be able to do it soon. There may be others, but those are the two that I'm familiar with. I've also been observing a general trend of r
84.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
My point is that government regulation of auto steer, driver monitoring, and other adas features won’t help with the more dangerous phantom braking issues. And these aren’t talked about much at all with Tesla or any other cars that may have
85.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
Twice in the last year (>13k miles total). One of them involved a truck pulling a fifth wheel that crept into my lane, but not far enough to warrant an emergency braking response. The other was a similar situation involving a vehicle mer
86.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
The others claim that you can drive without your hands on the wheel, despite the fact that the time required for takeover can be milliseconds. I'm really not convinced that is objectively better, even with whitelisted roads.
87.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
IMO, Tesla is a bit worse, but I agree with this in principle. I've had other cars phantom brake in similar situations. The worst phantom brakes that I've had from AP were cases where a car really was creeping into my lane a bit.
88.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
Because it generally works really well, and most of the phantom braking is generally 5-10 mph drops that aren't as dramatic as the on in the forum post being referenced.
89.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
Inside the Tesla community, we all know this is by far the worst thing about autopilot and by far the most dangerous. Outside the community, we get frustrated by silly debates about lane centering and other FSD-like features that actually w
90.
▲
by
jsight
5y ago
> Most companies in this industry, thankfully, seem to be moving carefully and rolling out their products conservatively; Having used other products, I think this is objectively not true. I've seen "Pro" pilot accelerate i
More ›