jshot

5 ms·

1.
by jshot 15y ago
That would require all individuals to have the disposable income to cover all their own medical costs. The further down the income ladder you go, the less an option it appears.
2.
by jshot 15y ago
One of those books so many people reference without having read. It's almost weird that it's the WSJ that's referencing it.
3.
by jshot 15y ago
You should start with what they actually understand. Do they think LulzSec is a bunch of social parasites with too much time and tech knowledge? Build on and/or correct what they think.
4.
by jshot 15y ago
Seems weird to only say it's an "improved experience" to no longer be able to write 2,001 characters. Can't remember many long comments on that site that have been worth it - they're usually bickering that wears thing - but still, that read
5.
by jshot 15y ago
Given Steve Jobs's disdain for games, it'd be funny if he conquered the market. Mobile is certainly capturing the handheld and casual market. I do wonder if it'll ever do something that overtakes or renders obsolete the console market, thou
6.
by jshot 15y ago
It looks like a pretty clear case of semantic confusion. When the article named it, I just assumed that was the actual name of Orville's standard Gourmet popcorn. Both the real and fictional names are a mess of generic advertising words, ne
7.
by jshot 15y ago
Leaves me even more curious for what the future of their hardware is.
8.
by jshot 15y ago
That's only half an opinion, though. He's arguing that the bestselling authors give self-published ones the room to charge more. In the "value" scape, he doesn't get to decide how much his book is worth, but wouldn't be able to charge 3.99
9.
by jshot 15y ago
There's something really messed up if you don't care about the person from whom you're reading several hundred pages.
10.
by jshot 15y ago
Depends if the reader cares about the author?