jshier

19 ms·

181.
by jshier 3y ago
Alt stores also require specific insurance, which doesn't seem to be the case here.
182.
by jshier 3y ago
Depends on what you do. Best bet is to find benchmarks from the various M3 reviews and see if any are similar to your workflow. For Geekbench 6, the M1 Max is about 2400/12700 while the M3 is about 3100/12000, so for CPU constrain
183.
by jshier 3y ago
Is there a single popular Tauri app? What are the most popular?
184.
by jshier 3y ago
Thanks. It seems the macOS release is a bit behind on brew (0.9.1) and doesn't include the cjpegli tool yet.
185.
by jshier 3y ago
I have an existing workflow where I take JPEGs (giant PNGs) from designers and reencode them using mozjpeg. However, I can't find a way to invoke jpegli tool in the same way, especially since it seems to just be part of the jpeg-xl too
186.
by jshier 3y ago
Pop doesn’t seem to have been updated in years, what’s going on?
187.
by jshier 3y ago
Only remaining support channel is their community forums. Whether you'll get an official response is another question. I don't recall Cloudflare routing request to their free clients differently than paid, but I've read multi
188.
by jshier 3y ago
And no need for `brew update` unless you've turned automatic updates off.
189.
by jshier 3y ago
First season seaQuest wasn't B-grade either, unless you're overly influenced by the use of mid-nineties CGI. Just look at the interior sets and how much water they use! Add to that the sheer amount of CGI they used (anything happe
190.
by jshier 3y ago
Fascinating and thorough analysis! I guess if you think an account is unused, just delete it!
191.
by jshier 3y ago
What an odd coincidence. One of my most popular answers on StackOverflow covers some of these differences, and I just got another upvote on it yesterday. For an answer from 2010 it keeps going. https://stackoverflow.com/ques
192.
by jshier 3y ago
Sounds like you want Mojo, Lattner's statically typed language built on Python. In any case, the language you describe wouldn't be compatible with Obj-C except through an import layer like Swift. "Obj-C without the C" is
193.
by jshier 3y ago
They are separate compilers. Obj-C is compiled by clang, Swift by the Swift compiler. You enable bridging in Xcode and then get access to your Obj-C code in Swift through the use of a bridging header, and Swift in Obj-C through the use of t
194.
by jshier 3y ago
You know you don't have to choose one or the other, right? The languages interoperate and there's really no overhead to adopting Swift anymore. On newer OSes you're using tons of Swift under the hood anyway.
195.
by jshier 3y ago
Kind of, but without the reactive UI bits, since SwiftUI already provides that (they provide a way to publish state into the older frameworks as well). It's heavily inspired by Elm and React but doesn't match 1:1 with either.
196.
by jshier 3y ago
> I often wonder what Obj-C would look like today if Apple had put the time and effort into it instead of Swift. It would largely look like Swift, since the goals of Swift (and most modern languages), safety and expressiveness, are funda
197.
by jshier 3y ago
Apple seems to think the UI frameworks should only focus on UI, and so overall arch is an afterthought. You can, of course, navigate and store state using the tools provided, but it's a pain to do so beyond local screens, where you hav
198.
by jshier 3y ago
No, List still has some awful performance cliffs unless you go out of your way to model your infinite lists in a way it can handle. There are some nice UI / NSTableView / CollectionView wrappers nowadays though.
199.
by jshier 3y ago
Ah true. Not sure why you replied then. Your point about Foundation was meaningless and the others just nits. Do you have an actual point to make?
200.
by jshier 3y ago
At this point you can't separate Swift from the rest of the system so cleanly. Since it's now included with the OS directly and linked to from many system libraries, including parts of Foundation which have been directly rewritten
201.
by jshier 3y ago
Not only can you use UIKit / AppKit in Swift (always have been), you can wrap them into SwiftUI as well. There's really no need to choose nowadays.
202.
by jshier 3y ago
> Which assertion was wrong? Your original assertion that Apple wasn't rewriting anything.
203.
by jshier 3y ago
Yeah, you really need to combine SwiftUI with a dedicated architecture like PointFree's Swift Composable Architecture. It solves your state and navigation problems while adding dependency and testing solutions as well. Apple's stu
204.
by jshier 3y ago
Depends what they are. Most of the time those are unavailable because they've been replaced with better Swift imports of the same API somewhere. Less commonly it's because they use one of the few C features that can't be impo
205.
by jshier 3y ago
> That's a mult-year project in its very early stages, yet we're already almost 10 years into Swift (more than 10 years of Swift internally to Apple). It has already shipped, replacing parts of Foundation in the 2023 OS version
206.
by jshier 3y ago
Aside from inline assembly, Swift can operate at just a low level, it just requires more work, since those operations are unsafe. All of Apple's public frameworks are importable into Swift. At this point there are more frameworks unava
207.
by jshier 3y ago
They're literally rewriting in Swift right now. Foundation is being rewritten entirely in Swift. All new code is in Swift. All new frameworks are Swift-only. They're using Swift from low level firmware on the Secure Enclave to app
208.
by jshier 3y ago
The IDE was Project Builder, Interface Builder was a separate, as the name implies, builder for interfaces that could then be connected to Obj-C code in Project Builder. They continued as separate apps even after Apple bought NeXT and shipp
209.
by jshier 3y ago
It's an especially ironic accusation given she's currently dealing with YouTube channels stealing her write-ups and reading them into a video using AI. She even had a "if you read this you're an AI bot" section in a
210.
by jshier 3y ago
Yeah, according to the linked article 5 - 10% of people are injured using the escape slides, which is why they waited for the stairs in this case.

More ›