Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jshevek
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
143 ms
·
751.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
I think that was a terrible choice, which I believe reflects some of the naivete which informs several aspects of how he has handled this overall situation. Guilt by association is an irrational and awful way to defame someone, and he leave
752.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
I agree with everything you are saying. It does not look like Google's management reacted fairly, nor rationally. I believe it is vital to the health of our society, our culture, for us to look carefully at why one of the worlds most
753.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
> Many employees felt intimidated and that they now had to prove in a work setting that they are not "more neurotic on average than men". Since we can't read minds, we don't know how they felt. We only know that they
754.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
Jordan Peterson is great. He's a thoughtful, honest person who is delightfully transparent in his efforts to make sense of the universe. He publicly spoke up in support of free speech, and therefore become a target to be intimidated a
755.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
In retrospect, it almost seems like they were fishing for people who have 'unsavory opinions' so they can force them to attend diversity training (even the name is Orwellian) and fire them if it doesn't work out.
756.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
Your statement would be more fair and accurate with qualification, such as "some parts of the left". For example, would you agree that classical liberals are still on the left?
757.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
> But they won't change their position. If anything, their position will be radicalized. For example, from classical liberal to alt-right. You make an excellent point. I am a lifelong feminist, anti-racist, pro-LBTQ atheist who pas
758.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
"using a newly created account means you aren't." This is wrong. Using a newly created account does not mean the communicator is approaching this in bad faith. That's a complete non sequitor. "lack of subsequent e
759.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
That's wonderful that you are open to feedback from geeks with fringe interests. If I were in charge of this project, I would strive for simplicity and for appeal to the widest audience, and not indulge the geeks, students, professiona
760.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
Startup investing requires willingness to take risks with an unknown future.
761.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
As a fan of tmux and xmonad, I was hopeful that tilix might combine the best of both worlds into one tool. After reading your comment, I get the impression that this is not the case.
762.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
I agree with the idea of feedback on how far you've progressed - though a linear graphic might not be possible. I assume we are navigating a tree whose depth varies greatly with your answers. After a particular selection you might have
763.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
My agreement with this sentiment was stronger before they announced their commitment to accommodate BCC, at least for withdrawal.
764.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
Are you saying that the investors would get a better return on their investment if they had instead simply purchased bitcoins? That claim seems to require the ability to know the future. Bitcoin may eventually be superseded by a superior al
765.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
He did also comment on and0's post as well.
766.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
He is clearly being aggressively demonized by some, at least internally. Even Sundar's statement using the word 'neurotic' reads like an attempt to smear him. James Damore referred to neuroticism in the personality metric se
767.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
The convenience of bangs. (Other comments elaborate on the details)
768.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
To answer the title question: I discovered this week that Bing has radically improved in recent years. Between them & DDG, I don't see that I'll need to rely on Google search ever again.
769.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
Only one of us insists our experience is canonical, and an appropriated basis for advocating bigotry & prejudice based on diction.
770.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
It's pretty clear from the totality of this person's comments that they are here to obfuscate and troll. Not sure why this is allowed on HN.
771.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
No. Assuming someone is posting in bad faith for this reason is an act of bad faith. Your statement reveals hypocrisy.
772.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
Here is a transcript, for anyone interested: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1exNF3d5wjzr33aLEQkbdKx5V...
773.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
Didn't github actually hire some diversity training people who projected a slide attacking white women?
774.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
What harm did this viewpoint cause to others?
775.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
Why is it toxic?
776.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
So you are saying that ideological intolerance is a problem throughout the industry?
777.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
Why do you assume he did it at work? Maybe you are unfamiliar with Google's culture. Employees are encouraged to engage in conversations about the culture and values of the company, using mediums like this. Google is not rigid about &q
778.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
Yes, that was a good interview. Much better than the interview with the other guy, mentioned in this article.
779.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
I would imagine that the nature of this training would vary greatly between different companies. And given the extremity of the reactions by certain left leaning people at Google this past week - I can imagine that the diversity training at
780.
▲
by
jshevek
9y ago
It seems to me that Jordan Peterson [0] is an interesting, thoughtful person who is very transparent about his personal journal to find meaning and understand... well, existence for lack of a better word. I highly recommend his podcasts.
More ›