jryle70

4 ms·

1.
by jryle70 7d ago
All the post says is that it was known to be an unsolved cypher. Nothing more, nothing less. Maybe you can give it a try? https://scienceblogs.de/klausis-krypto-kolumne/unsolved-adfx...
2.
by jryle70 7d ago
For every human good art that is cheap I can show you ten that are not. The problem is you don't know which version you'd get. Someone charges less because they are unknown. Fixing AI art is much less hassle than human one.
3.
by jryle70 7d ago
I think "a lot" is very subjective. I can also say "a lot of people really like AI-generated arts" and that would be true as well. HN is a place where a lot of normally objective, informed, and probably very nice folks i
4.
by jryle70 7d ago
So it isn't really about art?
5.
by jryle70 7d ago
A lot of posters or arts in general are to be seen once and never again. If you put pre-AI arts together in an exhibition like at the top of the article are you sure it wouldn't irritate people? I walk past countless of such arts every
6.
by jryle70 12d ago
Adidas and Puma, created by brothers, have been fierce competitors, dirty even, for 80 years. Who do you think the parent rooted for? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dassler_brothers_feud
7.
by jryle70 13d ago
Source? on HN you can say whatever you want. Your own opinion, without even facts to back it up. The more confident you sound the more convincing you are.
8.
by jryle70 15d ago
HN crowd criticize social media for algorithmic feeds. They are proud that HN is more organic. Now they want exactly that when they don't like what they see?
9.
by jryle70 15d ago
> It's important to be able to read through PR in planted pieces Planted pieces? how about directly from the operator: Without the lifetime extension investment program, the plant – which currently employs approximately 580 people
10.
by jryle70 15d ago
> “Job-creating infrastructure” would be infrastructure that creates jobs. A chamber of commerce, small business lenders, startup accelerators etc. Such a bizarre logic. Since when a chamber of commerce or startup accelerators are infras
11.
by jryle70 15d ago
> No public money needed, it is easily profitable to do without. According to whom? Show the number, don't just be hand wavy. If it is struggling now to extend beyond 2030 then how can it easily be profitable? Think about your logic
12.
by jryle70 15d ago
First of all, are you willing to wait to find out? Second of all, if it is not Google, it'd be either other businesses, or from tax money. Why should tax money be used to bail out a failed business?
13.
by jryle70 15d ago
The question is how much they buy. It may not be enough to keep the plant running. Google will only buy up to 50% of what the plant can produce, but the deal allows the plant to operate beyond 2030 according to the operator. Side note: Real
14.
by jryle70 15d ago
> Calling data centers “job creating infrastructure” seems like a bit of an oxymoron That's your original point, which is wrong since, as you admitted, data center boom is clearly creating jobs. If you meant those jobs are offset by
15.
by jryle70 15d ago
Do you know the specific of which countries buying how much electricity from this plant, or just your wildly guess?
16.
by jryle70 15d ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49652346
17.
by jryle70 16d ago
> they’re displacing previous nuclear power users onto dirtier They are not. The plant may not survive beyond 2030 without this order.
18.
by jryle70 16d ago
The plant may be closed without this Google's order. The cost to keep it running is substantial. I guess that's what you prefer? "The Finland deal will ensure that the Loviisa plant keeps operating beyond 2030, the companies
19.
by jryle70 16d ago
You sound like an OpenAI's competitor. (Just a faintest, without any clue, completely baseless suspicion on my end, just like what you did)
20.
by jryle70 17d ago
The whole thread without a single technical post about the significance (or not) of the announcement. Who want to follow me to create a new site that focus on the substance of the news? I'm not abandoning HN, I can come back here to ma
21.
by jryle70 17d ago
Do human drivers in the same "good weather" cities have fewer accidents than human in other places?
22.
by jryle70 17d ago
Can you link to those reports? How reputable are the investigators? Financial market has great incentive to stay informed. Those 401ks are their bread and butter customers, and not every bank/fund is Meta's co-conspirator in its s
23.
by jryle70 17d ago
It was next to the other piece, for at least 8 hrs.
24.
by jryle70 18d ago
Ah, "Americans are awful. Now we can be just awful" > they also call for banning Chinese models and open weights models... So I guess Anthropic called for banning Chinese models when they said "but let me state it clearly
25.
by jryle70 19d ago
Capitalism at its finest! Or wait, never mind
26.
by jryle70 19d ago
> IBM write all this breathless marketing copy that seems detached from the actual utility of the device What are the actual utility according to IBM? Did they say you can order one today on their website? Or even "call us to get th
27.
by jryle70 19d ago
They also totally don't care bout Chinese companies, they use those products because there are really no alternatives. Apple and Samsung (reluctantly) comply. I guess we know which other companies don't?
28.
by jryle70 19d ago
When news doesn't confirm my belief, doubt it and make sure people know. Trust me I do the same.
29.
by jryle70 19d ago
First of all, cite them. Second of all, on which time scale, are they both talking about the near, mid or long terms?
30.
by jryle70 19d ago
It's handy-wavy because nobody knows how it will turn out and which new jobs will be created. In the same way as every predictions about AI bust, job lost, moat (or lack of it) is. If you feel confident about your predictions, don&#x2

More ›