jrswab

4 ms·

1.
by jrswab 7mo ago
Yes, I've used it with on OpenAI compatible API from an internal LLM at my job.
2.
by jrswab 7mo ago
Sorry, I need to update that. I just added MCP support a day or so ago.
3.
by jrswab 7mo ago
You don't have all the Claude Code overhead. It only gets what you give it.
4.
by jrswab 7mo ago
I'm excited to see how this plays out. Keep me updated on x(twitter)
5.
by jrswab 7mo ago
Love to hear it! Thanks for checking it out and feel free to put up an issue on GitHub if you have any ideas for improvements.
6.
by jrswab 7mo ago
Yes, I think it will be quite trivial to make a output allow list. That's a great idea!
7.
by jrswab 7mo ago
I've shared a few flows I use a lot right now in some other comments.
8.
by jrswab 7mo ago
That's my dream.
9.
by jrswab 7mo ago
Not yet but it will be easy to add. If you need it can you create an issue in GitHub? I should be able to get that in today.
10.
by jrswab 7mo ago
> Curious if you’ve experimented with workflows where agents produce artifacts (files, reports, etc.) rather than just returning text. Yes! I run a ghost blog (a blog that does not use my name) and have axe produce artifacts. The flow is
11.
by jrswab 7mo ago
Thanks! Looks like sgpt is a cool tool. Axe is oriented around automation rather than interaction like sgpt. Instead of asking something you define it once and hook it into a workflow.
12.
by jrswab 7mo ago
This is not a replacement for either in my opinion. Apps like codex and pi are interactive but ax is non-interactive. You define an agent once and the trigger it however you please.
13.
by jrswab 7mo ago
I'm happy you brought this up. I've been thinking about this and working on a plan to make it as solid as possible. For now, the best way would be to run each agent in a docker container (there is an example Dockerfile in the repo
14.
by jrswab 7mo ago
Thank you for your service.
15.
by jrswab 7mo ago
I am pretty proud of this one :)
16.
by jrswab 7mo ago
nooo! lol but thanks, I'll go hunt it down.
17.
by jrswab 7mo ago
I have a few flows I'm using it for and have a growing list of things I want to automate. Basically, if there is a process that takes a human to do (like creating drafts or running scripts with variable data) I make axe do it. 1. I hav
18.
by jrswab 7mo ago
I've not heard of that before but after looking into it I think they are solving different problems. Dotprompt is a promt template that lives inside app code to standardize how we write prompts. Axe is an execution runtime you run from
19.
by jrswab 7mo ago
Exactly! I also made it to chain them together so each agent only gets what it needs to complete its one specific job.
20.
by jrswab 7mo ago
Thanks for checking it out! And yes the tool is indeed catering to that crowed. It's a need I have and thought others could use it as well.
21.
by jrswab 7mo ago
Not yet but is on the short list to implement. What would you need from a session for single purpose agents? I'm seeing it more as a way to track what's been done.
22.
by jrswab 7mo ago
hahaha; this is what I was going for.
23.
by jrswab 7mo ago
This is not an LLM but a Binary to run LLMs as single purpose agents that can chain together.
24.
by jrswab 7mo ago
> how you would approach budget when using Axe Great question and it's something that I've not dig into yet. But I see no problem adding a way to limit LLMs by tokens or something similar to keep the cost for the user within re
25.
Show HN: Axe – A 12MB binary that replaces your AI framework(github.com)
227 points by jrswab 7mo ago|128 comments
26.
by jrswab 7mo ago
Me too! I just shared with a coworker that the binary is only 6.57MB and running in a Alpine Docker container is only 24MB.
27.
by jrswab 7mo ago
Hi everyone, I built Axe because I got tired of the "everything is a chatbot" pattern in AI tooling. Axe treats LLM agents like Unix programs. Each agent is a TOML config with a focused job such as a code reviewer, a log analyzer,
28.
Show HN: Axe – A CLI for running single-purpose LLM agents(github.com)
6 points by jrswab 7mo ago|3 comments
29.
by jrswab 2y ago
This is a great thought. I'll have to do some planning around this. Though I'd assume if you don't like light roasts you'd not be buying them and then would have nothing to rate. But trusting the users to not "hate
30.
by jrswab 2y ago
haha yes, thank you for sharing. I wanted to get out an MVP to see if people would actually want something like this. It was a balance between spending too much time making it perfect upfront vs. getting something out to test the desire for

More ›