jrl5432

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jrl5432 7y ago

   For now
2. 2.▲
   by jrl5432 9y ago

   This article was deeply unsatisfying, leaving the reader without any adequate conclusion. The tone of the article appeared to be "philosophical" in nature but it is difficult to glean anything useful or interesting - the "mea
3. 3.▲
   by jrl5432 10y ago

   As someone who had relatives die just before an exam and who proceeded to write (and fail) said exam, use the deferral if you need to.
4. 4.▲
   by jrl5432 11y ago

   I don't think this article is relevant or convincing. None of the arguments were particularly good and the author gave me no reason to care. I expect a higher standard of quality on hacker news.
5. 5.▲
   by jrl5432 13y ago

   It was a post by a developer recounting his experience with a particular recruiting agency. Basically, he was given an interview through an agency TestDriven Recruiting (or something similar) for a job outside his home country. The agency a