jpcompartir

5 ms·

31.
by jpcompartir 1y ago
Agree here - in a nutshell it strikes me as intellectually dishonest to intentionally pass off some other entity's work as one's own.
32.
by jpcompartir 1y ago
Edit: OP confirms there's no AI-generated code, so do ignore me. The code style - and in particular the *comments - indicate most of the code was written by AI. My apologies if you are not trying to hide this fact, but it seems like co
33.
by jpcompartir 1y ago
Yes, they are not a private tutor, and they do not claim to be. That is just the market they are going after. They believe they can help people reach better outcomes for less. Whether they're correct or not is another question.
34.
by jpcompartir 1y ago
I believe their rationale is that a private tutor costs more than this per lesson , and they're targeting the people who will pay for a tutor once/twice a week for themselves or their children. I tend to agree with you, it seems
35.
by jpcompartir 1y ago
This is an extremely welcome move in a good direction from OpenAI. I can only thank them for all of the extra work around the models - Harmony structure, metal/torch/triton implementations, inference guides, cookbooks & fine-t
36.
by jpcompartir 1y ago
Most reasoned take is directly from the paper itself: "We strongly emphasize that this paper is largely a pedagogical exercise, with interesting discoveries and strange serendipities, worthy of a record in the scientific literature. By
37.
by jpcompartir 1y ago
This is a nonsense critique. Modest results are worth publishing, as are bad results.
38.
by jpcompartir 1y ago
It seems more like Open Source devs who are looking to build clout/rep with MLX? Pretty sure Claude Sonnet is actually doing most of the work.
39.
by jpcompartir 1y ago
Good question, I was wondering the same. My hunch would be that even if we had a lot more annotated examples of reasoning and retrieval over 10,000+ tokens, the architectures we have today would still be limited.
40.
by jpcompartir 1y ago
Spot on.
41.
by jpcompartir 2y ago
I don't mean to be ungenerous, just pointing out a very small detail the author may not have been aware of. I agree with your reading of the Wikipedia article, which I take to mean that they moved first to somewhere else in Devon, and
42.
by jpcompartir 2y ago
Just a small detail, but Teignmouth is in Devon, i.e. the family didn't move from Devon to Teignmouth. Assuming the snippet in the article was from Wikipedia, where it says: "He and his mother left London for safety to stay with