Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
josteink
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
48 ms
·
601.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
You mean, aside from police being the main target of BLM ever since the George Floyd incident?
602.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
Any way to check iPhones if you don’t have a Mac?
603.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
> Thankfully I learned about OpenRGB. Especially for Linux-users where official support may not be available for your RGB HW (mobo, RAM, whatever), OpenRGB is a godsend. And scriptable too, so I can disable all that crap at boot-time.
604.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
Was looking for this exact comment. I’m honestly waiting for a tree-sitter (or LSP) based paredit-mode to show up, so that I can use it for all modes and languages, and not just LISP.
605.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
With us all being secured from Gopher already, that’s all that remains to establish a 100% secure browser.
606.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
> Printing and 3D acceleration are supported by the OS through stable and cross-platform APIs (CUPS, OpenGL). Is CUPS (and OpenGL) really available on Windows without bundling additional libraries and/or services?
607.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
Ok. And I assume that’ll all work at PCI speeds making it much more performant than using virtio-based forwarding. Sounds neat. Do I need to do anything besides UEFI boot my virt-manager (QEMU) VM to make use of things like this?
608.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
Thanks. So if I’m already UEFI booting my VMs with dedicated volumes, the key difference is how GPU pass-through is done?
609.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
> If you want easy, this is not for you. Setting up LG first requires setting up a VFIO Virtual Machine. Any quick links to how that differs from a regular QEMU/KVM setup?
610.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
> That sounds very interesting. Does that mean I should be able to load a VM containing my windows partition fron linux, even without a dedicated GPU? That works fine. I do that at work to avoid nuking/tampering with the Windows ins
611.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
> the video may cause harm Or let me try, is “hateful”? Yeah. That about clears it up, I guess. Clear as mud.
612.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
> They've also dramatically increased the proportion and intrusiveness of those ads over the last year, taking advantage of a near-monopoly position and a captive audience. Agreed. But they didn’t do this until after providing you
613.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
> Facebook called it a step toward “interoperability, saying, “We want to give people a choice so they can reach their friends across these networks from whichever app they prefer.” If they really mean that (and ofcourse they don’t), th
614.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
What an incredibly level-headed write-up. Imagine working somewhere for 17 years and then facing this: > The full story is complex but effectively a bureaucratic mistake led to my position falling into question, despite plenty of support
615.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
> On other distributions secure boot doesn't work out of the box and requires some manual tweaking I can’t recall having issues with Fedora, but I’m not 100% on that. I might be wrong. > Also, secure boot will have implications,
616.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
I see I’ve landed so deep in the sea of FUD, beyond my ability to keep my feet dry, but I’ll make one last attempt at spreading actual knowledge. 1. Too guaranteed boot Linux with UEFI Secure Boot OOB without technical fiddling you have to
617.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
I’m not. The default Ubuntu installation media boots with UEFI and secure boot OOB with no action required by the end-user. It literally couldn’t be simpler.
618.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
> It's a random Amazon customer. This is HN. You and I know that GNU/Linux distros can pass Secure Boot just fine The default Ubuntu installation media boots OOB. It’s really, really not hard.
619.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
> but because Linux requires you to disable Secure Boot Patently false. I’m secure-booting all my Ubuntu installations and (iirc) I could do that too back when I used Fedora. Why do people keep repeating this FUD? Linux plus UEFI Secure
620.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
> I installed jdk quite a few times without root and never had a problem. Jdk only depends on essential system libraries like libc. The Ubuntu repos suggests there are more dependencies than just plain libc. https://packages.u
621.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
> I often keep a collection of older versions and different patch levels in my home directory. And they are obviously going to work because you’ve satisfied all the main OpenJDK dependencies through the install with your package-manager.
622.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
This is just a gentle reminder that as long as you’re happy to buy into walled gardens, the devices you buy are not truly yours. You’re merely in possession of them, with others allowed to set the rules. As an AppleTV user I could be tota
623.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
The OP is complaining about needing root to satisfy som third-party library dependency (libicu) when installing the .NET SDK outside the system package-manager, with the tarball only. I think that’s a pretty far fetched complaint. There are
624.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
As one of the original contributors trying to land BSD-support back in the 1.0 days (2015!!! before life got in the way), that’s been the story for waaay to long now. I really hope some day we finally land it. Even as a full time Linux-user
625.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
> but as a Linux programmer, I found it difficult to install the dotnet sdk without the root permission It’s a tarball. Unpack it wherever you like. What exact problems did you have? Edit: I’ve even “installed” the .NET SDK on ARM/A
626.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
Just out of curiosity, what part do you find troublesome? TPM, UEFI or both? And why?
627.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
“Real” and most people will know what you’re talking about. The only people using the term “cis” are trans-activists.
628.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
> the very small community that we are talking about is disproportionately being subjected to murder, physical abuse, emotional abuse, and widespread discrimination. Citation needed. From what I can tell they are being given more leeway
629.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
But why does companies use slack if “everyone” hates it? For once, I’ve never been to a company which uses it. There are literally countless options in the IM/groupware field which is not Slack.
630.
▲
by
josteink
5y ago
> Once all steps are complete, we will reimburse you the cost of creating this account. That literally sounds like a Nigerian email scam.
More ›