jorendorffmoz

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jorendorffmoz 12y ago

   Well, it's the difference between getting paid (salary, fixed, no logical incentive to grow/improve) versus getting paid (percentages of benefit, the more benefit you create the more you make, growing non-linearly with your act
2. 2.▲
   by jorendorffmoz 12y ago

   But, if a project is clearly the work of, say, 2-5 individual developers, it's easier to see how those individuals are creating much more value than anybody is possibly compensating them for. I think this is true of anything worth do
3. 3.▲
   by jorendorffmoz 12y ago

   I guess what I'm saying is, I don't see how your (or anyone's) interests would be served by the cost of Redis being a lot higher.
4. 4.▲
   by jorendorffmoz 12y ago

   I do want to argue the point. :) The strange miracle of open source software is that when companies use something like Redis to make a lot of money, they end up investing in it, they contribute work to the project, and the community does