jonmatherson

3 ms·

1.
by jonmatherson 18y ago
Your whois points to Ann Arbor. Your comments indicate that you are not familiar with the internal workings of the city -- most people in your age bracket are not. I am actually not saying you are wrong or that your questions are without me
2.
by jonmatherson 18y ago
Well that kind of ends the discussion doesn't it? If a group of employees of the State says it is true it must be true... The disconnect stems from the fact that in Ann Arbor there is little shared ground to communicate the actual milieu in
3.
by jonmatherson 18y ago
Your questioning is quite justified. Unfortunately, San Francisco is on par with Chicago in terms of corruption and the way to win votes and keep your job is by siding with tenants.
4.
by jonmatherson 18y ago
Given the nature and number of crimes committed by the plaintiffs (as they've admitted to in or committed during the grand jury) and the fact they're essentially being given a pass because it is politically beneficial to help tenants and ha
5.
by jonmatherson 18y ago
The question is the veracity of those involved. Given that Morrow's complaints are financially motivated, he has admitted that he had no right to be in the room, he never left (i.e. he did not fear for his safety), and he has perjured himse
6.
by jonmatherson 18y ago
I don't think it is fair for you to continue commenting. It is clear that you are (unintentionally) misrepresenting the facts. It was not Morrow's apartment and that was in fact why he was allowed to stay and pay 308/month.
7.
by jonmatherson 18y ago
Actually you do. If you establish a pattern of perjury as well as the prosecutor coaching witness to hide exculpatory evidence then you have some fundamental problems with your case. The Durham NC case was not as clear cut as it was made ou
8.
by jonmatherson 18y ago
You appear to have missed the fact that Morrow not only works the system, but has committed fraud and over the course of the grand jury has committed multiple instances of perjury. At issue is his veracity. My question is why the officer di