jonatanheyman

9 ms·

61.
by jonatanheyman 6y ago
> If they allowed Epic to skirt their rules, they'd have to do the same for everyone Apple is already allowing Amazon to "skirt their rules".
62.
by jonatanheyman 6y ago
No. The solution is to allow third party app stores, and then Apple can keep charging whatever commission they want. The high commission percentage is not the only issue with Apple's monopoly. It's also that they are gate keepers
63.
by jonatanheyman 7y ago
> It'd be like taking a walk in the park and paying/supporting the park if you feel the need to. It'd be like taking a walk in the park and paying/supporting the park - by having a salesperson walking beside you tryin
64.
by jonatanheyman 8y ago
Yes, it's still hypocritical. You can, and in my opinion should, criticize Iran for a lot . For example for being a theocracy like you mention. But saying "you cannot have nukes, but we can" is still very much hypocritical.
65.
by jonatanheyman 8y ago
> and is now in a nuclear bomb program for the grace of god I have no love for Iran what so ever, but opposing them for having a nuclear program while not opposing the US or any other country who also has nukes, is so extremely hypocriti
66.
by jonatanheyman 8y ago
No, for SSL certificates there's value in having a short expiry. For example if the private keys leak. There's no value in having a domain name (that you want to keep) expire.
67.
by jonatanheyman 8y ago
JavaScript doesn't break if you don't supply all arguments in a function call.
68.
by jonatanheyman 8y ago
> This won't happen unless you have a huge traffic which usually should translate to revenues that can support it. For a B2B product where every user/visitor pays a high fee, sure. However, for a consumer website that is either
69.
by jonatanheyman 9y ago
I totally get your frustration. One thing you could do is to write to your elected officials, and urge them to press for American and international sanctions agains Myanmar.
70.
by jonatanheyman 9y ago
Ah, I didn't know that, thanks. In those cases you're probably correct that it's illegal to put up such camera without obtaining a permission. Though I don't think it's the law about "Kränkande Fotografering&qu
71.
by jonatanheyman 9y ago
Not true. Anyone is allowed to take photographs and film in public spaces which should definitely include forests. Though this does not apply to installing permanent cameras in public spaces, which is much more restricted.
72.
by jonatanheyman 9y ago
No, I doubt that. For someone to be convicted for this, criminal intent must be proven. If someone lives alone - and informs any guests that they have a camera inside - it should be hard for the burglar to claim that the home owner intended
73.
by jonatanheyman 9y ago
In Sweden it's also a crime to secretly film someone in a private area (the whole home counts, and even garden and balcony). It doesn't matter who is being recorded or who put up the camera. The maximum penalty is two years impris
74.
by jonatanheyman 9y ago
A great self-hosted CI alternative is Drone.io ( https://github.com/drone/drone ). To set it up is simply a matter of starting a Docker image and creating a .drone.yml file (very similar to .travis.yml). Note: I'm
75.
by jonatanheyman 10y ago
I made a slightly improved version using <ol> and <li> elements to not have to manually output the numbers within the <span> element: https://jsfiddle.net/r8c2Lsz7/
76.
by jonatanheyman 10y ago
Rather than using the URL bar, I think it's more likely that people will just open their Uber app, flight booking app, shopping app, etc. I don't think that is an unlikely development.
77.
by jonatanheyman 11y ago
There's a huge different between an actual lawsuit and the threat of a lawsuit. Kik's lawyers were being bullies, and NPM caved in, instead of standing up for one of their users who seem to have contributed a lot to the commun
78.
by jonatanheyman 11y ago
A malicious person will always be able to find a public space with lots of people. A public square, schoolyard, mall, busy street, library or whatever. Besides, to defend against suicide bombings, the dogs would have to encounter everyone
79.
by jonatanheyman 11y ago
According to BBC the explosion are believed to have been in the checkin area, i.e. outside of the security screening.
80.
by jonatanheyman 11y ago
Sure, neither totalitarianism nor democracy are binary things, and there are no razor-sharp definitions. I'm sure you can find examples of those things in many countries that are generally considered "democratic". However, in
81.
by jonatanheyman 11y ago
The amount of information about the mentioned issues, available on the web is enormous. Anyone who want to read up on it can just use a search engine. I believe most users should be able to evaluate the credibility of the sources found them
82.
by jonatanheyman 11y ago
Limiting free speech, banning political opposition, arresting dissidents, persecuting people for their sexuality, invading neighbour sovereign states etc, etc. I don't know about you, but I think "totalitarian" draw a more co
83.
by jonatanheyman 11y ago
I like the design of the landing page. Perhaps you could add a concrete example of a use-case? I've had many projects where I've used multiple different APIs, but I don't really see when this would be useful.
84.
by jonatanheyman 11y ago
Not out of the box. However, as long as it's "request/response based" it's quite simple to write and use a custom client. See: http://docs.locust.io/en/latest/testing-other-systems.html
85.
by jonatanheyman 11y ago
That isn't a very good comparison, because Locust's use-case is very different. Locust is a tool/framework for writing code that simulates real user behaviour in a fairly realistic way. For example, it's very common to s
86.
by jonatanheyman 12y ago
As well as comparison to LMDB.
87.
by jonatanheyman 12y ago
As a website owner I'm free to respond with any HTTP headers I feel like like when your computer makes a request. You're free to use a browser that doesn't decide to store cookies when you get a reply with those headers.
88.
by jonatanheyman 12y ago
That sounds strange. Unless you're doing a lot of performance expensive stuff in your test scripts, you should easily be able to reach a higher RPS. Also, are you comparing a single Locust process to Gatling? Since Gatling runs on the
89.
by jonatanheyman 12y ago
In the video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRsx5egJoYk ) at 1:22, when they demonstrate it, the receiver is pressing a keyboard and not a touch pad like the speaker voice says earlier in the video. The fact that they say
90.
Live stream from Nordic.js(viaplay.se)
2 points by jonatanheyman 12y ago|0 comments

More ›