3 ms·
> and is now in a nuclear bomb program for the grace of god I have no love for Iran what so ever, but opposing them for having a nuclear program while not oppo
by jonatanheyman 8y ago
> and is now in a nuclear bomb program for the grace of god
I have no love for Iran what so ever, but opposing them for having a nuclear program while not opposing the US or any other country who also has nukes, is so extremely hypocritical. I'm so astonished to see that argument over and over again.
- Qworg 8y agoIt isn't hypocritical unless you see both types of government as equivalent - liberal democracy vs theological roughly democracy.
- w0utert 8y agoRemind me again which country has been the only one in history to actually use atomic weapons on their enemies, killing tens of thousands of innocent people as collateral damage.
- jonatanheyman 8y agoYes, it's still hypocritical. You can, and in my opinion should, criticize Iran for a lot. For example for being a theocracy like you mention. But saying "you cannot have nukes, but we can" is still very much hypocritical.
- pluma 8y agoThe POTUS can arbitrarily take military action as long as it can somehow be tied to 9/11 so in effect the type of government doesn't matter much when it comes to the military threat each country imposes. Also, the US has a history of military intervention, suppression, assassinations and overthrowing democratically elected governments. That the US is more "liberal" is about as reassuring as being told the potion that is being used to poison you is 100% organic and GMO-free.