jolmg

55 ms·

871.
by jolmg 5y ago
I imagine the same is true of all window managers.
872.
by jolmg 5y ago
Isn't that because FreeBSD provides an emulation of Linux?
873.
by jolmg 5y ago
Very cool. I didn't know websites had that kind of control over pop-up placement. It gets quite confused with multi-monitor setups, though. I had to disconnect all but one display to be able to play. The paddles appeared on one display
874.
by jolmg 5y ago
I thought that was because of a lacking density of parks in the city.
875.
by jolmg 5y ago
Indeed. cd $(mktemp -d) git init echo bar > file.txt git add file.txt git commit -m "init" echo foo_bar_baz > file.txt # select only "foo_" in magit-status and press "s" git diff --cache
876.
by jolmg 5y ago
Another commenter said that they also experienced slowdowns on macOS, so I thought the OS actually didn't matter much on this, but based on disgruntledphd2's comment, I guess it does.
877.
by jolmg 5y ago
I just called the status buffer from magit on a repo. It was 23 calls to git, mostly for rev-parse. The status buffer appeared instantaneously on a decade-old laptop. Whatever is causing the slowness you're seeing, I don't think i
878.
by jolmg 5y ago
> but rather around being selective about crafting self-consistent but single-theme revisions Actually, I think git's got Magit beat on that. Magit might make it easier to stage specific lines, but git can stage specific parts of li
879.
by jolmg 5y ago
> - I tried magit and just didn't get it. I couldn't couldn't find a happy path where I thought, "ah yes this is niice". I mostly use plain git instead of Magit, for more or less the same reason, although I like
880.
by jolmg 5y ago
Is the launching of processes on Windows so much slower than on Unix-type OSes that it would cause it to be "so slow" for that reason? Maybe the reason is another? Personally, I once had Magit act real slow at times because git-an
881.
by jolmg 5y ago
Right, but the up arrow didn't get in their way, right? So why get mad? I imagine that how it worked for them before is that the up arrow would move the cursor to the previous line into the output of the previous command, while feeding
882.
by jolmg 5y ago
I think the most noticeable difference is that `$foo` doesn't word-split unless you do `${=foo}`. Beyond that, I don't think one would notice they were using zsh instead of bash. In most ways, zsh is pretty much a superset of bash
883.
by jolmg 5y ago
Starting at > So, what did I discover about my own writing? There's multiple paragraphs on what they've learned about their own writing.
884.
by jolmg 5y ago
> I really don't see a reason for inkjet printers to exist, I hope they will disappear from the market. They're still useful for cheap printed confections. You can use them with edible ink and paper. It's quite nice to pri
885.
by jolmg 5y ago
> It's pretty obvious where the weakest link is. It isn't, considering how little information I've given you. The weakness of links depend on the threats we model and how we protect the links against such threats. You&#x27
886.
by jolmg 5y ago
> Yes, you would need to inform all the servers of the change, a compliant FIDO authenticator shouldn't be clonable. Depends on how you define clonable, but that shouldn't be a requirement to be able to avoid having to inform s
887.
by jolmg 5y ago
Why? authorized_keys holds public keys. Why would it defeat the purpose of a hardware private key?
888.
by jolmg 5y ago
You can setup alternate valid credentials. For example, in the case of the "have", you can have multiple valid keys. In the case of the "know", multiple valid passwords. In the case of the "are", perhaps on thi
889.
by jolmg 5y ago
I haven't used FIDO. If you lose your FIDO key, do you have the option of buying another one and making it authenticate like the original without having to inform all the servers of the change? I think the only advantage of FIDO over O
890.
by jolmg 5y ago
Android supports registering multiple fingerprints to get around this. I wonder if that's also possible with this key.
891.
by jolmg 5y ago
I haven't used any of the other modes on my Yubikey 4 than the OpenPGP Smartcard. I would hope that other modes also support PINs/passwords, so the fingerprint is just an additional factor. If that's the case, it's not n
892.
by jolmg 5y ago
I don't know of a similar product that supports tap-prompts and blinking lights[1] like Yubikeys do. Yubikey 4/5 still seem to be the best, IMO. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28765982
893.
by jolmg 5y ago
Me too. OpenPGP is super flexible and this would've been an upgrade to 3FA for everything I use it for.
894.
by jolmg 5y ago
Not sure how you want to combine automated daily rsyncs with hardware keys. You can use OpenPGP for ssh authentication, and set it up so it prompts you when rsync starts automatically. However, do you really want your automated jobs to depe
895.
by jolmg 5y ago
If this had OpenPGP support (though it may also be true of other modes) they'd also need to know your PIN code.
896.
by jolmg 5y ago
Not with the Bio series apparently, but at least on the Yubikey 4, when you're setup with OpenPGP, a tap works with a single request and it prompts you to tap with a blinking light. If it's blinking when you haven't done anyt
897.
by jolmg 5y ago
No OpenPGP Smartcard support, I see. :(
898.
by jolmg 5y ago
Or they could be using a legacy system that exports data in that format from times before CSV was invented/standardized. For example, SCO Unix's Informix SQL's `UNLOAD TO <file> SELECT ...` queries output in a format th
899.
by jolmg 5y ago
Image editing. And for buttons that only work via click events.
900.
by jolmg 5y ago
> The "shell" I'm suggesting still would run all those programs they just would be a direct child process of what would normally be just a terminal instead of a child of a bash process. I think you misunderstood. As I unde

More ›