jolmg

41 ms·

661.
by jolmg 4y ago
> Access is the biggest issue, as the OS only supports telnet, and serial access. OpenSSH works on it. This page has links to precompiled packages: https://scosales.com/knowledge-base/how-to-install-ssh-for-s... lin
662.
by jolmg 4y ago
org-mode in Emacs. On a headline representing a task or event, `C-c C-x C-i` to clock-in, `C-c C-x C-o` to clock-out. The agenda view includes what you've clocked in to during each day, and from it, `R` can give you a clock report for
663.
by jolmg 4y ago
> The idea of being one’s own boss was also appealing to many (0%). Typo or weird sarcasm?
664.
by jolmg 4y ago
Haskell uses `otherwise`. Example use: greater x y | x > y = x | otherwise = y In Haskell's case, this is a conditional syntax that's alternative to if-then-else, so `else` was already taken. `otherwise` is j
665.
by jolmg 4y ago
Actually, from the terms of service: > The following restrictions apply to your use of the Service. You are not allowed to: [...] 3. access the Service using any automated means (such as robots, botnets or scrapers) except (a) in the ca
666.
by jolmg 4y ago
There's the video results in the various search engines, like DDG, Bing, and Yahoo.
667.
by jolmg 4y ago
No, I thought you were being hyperbolic, but after you've explained your problems with signaling, I agree with it. Kind of depressed at the state of that, now...
668.
by jolmg 4y ago
You got me. That is quite horrible.
669.
by jolmg 4y ago
> Asynchronous signals have a lot of the same problems, but those problems are also present in single-threaded programs. Quite a few APIs have been added over time to try to make working with async signals easier and safer, but all of th
670.
by jolmg 4y ago
It's called trolling. They're using the word "horrible" to bait a response on something that can be easily argued on.
671.
by jolmg 4y ago
A more agreeable example would be Windows forbidding specific file and folder names to reserve for device names, something it apparently inherited from CP/M.
672.
by jolmg 4y ago
> and that (at least from my understanding) are hard to transfer to new devices seems like a risk I'm unwilling to take. It's not really hard. They're quite flexible. You can't read the key from them, but you can writ
673.
by jolmg 4y ago
> it's just easy to see how someone could convince themselves it's a worry Trying to make sense of it for myself, I can only imagine it's from believing the reason they're healthy is because they live in a perfectly s
674.
by jolmg 4y ago
> Yeah, but at the same time irrigation using sprinklers is going to coat the produce with whatever's left behind from the water evaporating. Same as it happens when people wash their veggies at home, or use their dishes they'v
675.
by jolmg 4y ago
> One person I'm thinking of in particular said she didn't believe the water was safe to drink there I mean, if she meant water from the tap, it's true that it's generally not considered potable. It's clean enoug
676.
by jolmg 4y ago
Yeah, to circle back, as I understood you, type 2 do both, type 1 only memorization, and I called type 1 bad, because, like the question of this post, they can punish understanding. You say that's fine; I still say it's bad, but I
677.
by jolmg 4y ago
> Memorization vs. Understanding is a false dichotomy. Hey, you're flipping us around. Who was it that wrote this?: > IMO they are two kinds of tests: I'm the one that's arguing that it's a false dichotomy, that te
678.
by jolmg 4y ago
Ok, you're thinking type 1 vs type 2 is multiple choice vs written answers. I'm thinking type 2 can have multiple choice, but then there's only 1 answer that can be correct. Type 1 can have multiple choice, but puts multiple
679.
by jolmg 4y ago
And type 2 tests don't achieve that? Remember, we're talking about the benefit of questions that encourage the ignoring of nuance.
680.
by jolmg 4y ago
So, a good question for a bad kind of test? Why shouldn't all tests be type 2?
681.
by jolmg 4y ago
> The actual solution is to have enough capital or at least an income source in order to not have to deal with bullshit poverty world people. Ha. Being poor might not be the thing to focus on, since they're all in the same arrangeme
682.
by jolmg 4y ago
> While it may be objectively possible to eat healthy, it’s often an unrealistic or at least demanding expectation given the circumstances. Wow. wow. Let's recap most expensive to least: ready-made healthy > ready-made junkfood &
683.
by jolmg 4y ago
> A direct example I can give is that I have many friends who live in shared accommodation with shitty kitchens because they're shared amongst 4 people or more and inevitably someone is a cretin. Ok, that makes more sense. I guess h
684.
by jolmg 4y ago
> I buy ready made food all of the time, I just try to go for high protein options and limit bullshit. It's a lot more expensive. But you do it because you can afford it. People that find it expensive would first cook for their meal
685.
by jolmg 4y ago
> The like-for-like example is [...] I mean, you did say > It's cheaper to eat nonfood though, particularly if you take preparation into account. So I took it as saying nonfood already comes prepared, while real food generally
686.
by jolmg 4y ago
I don't get the point of comparing the same quantities, nor of putting them in a single meal. It's an example. The price comparison holds for other forms of junkfood and veggies. And the other point is that 2lbs of carrots are goi
687.
by jolmg 4y ago
Around me I think on average a single cheap donut costs about the same as a couple pounds of carrots.
688.
by jolmg 4y ago
> and triangulation could track down any one of them. You know, I used to think that, but I'm not sure anymore that triangulation is easily done with radio signals. I mean, if we're talking about triangulating as measuring the
689.
by jolmg 4y ago
> My dream was that we'd eventually get a similar local BBS culture back in the form of small neighborhood wireless mesh networks Less anonymous than phone lines, I would imagine. Kind of curious how hard it is to find the source of
690.
by jolmg 4y ago
At least on Firefox you can assign tags to bookmarks and search based on those, the title, and the url. Bookmark search is as available as going to the address bar, typing "* ", then your search keywords.

More ›