joken0x

5 ms·

1.
by joken0x 5y ago
It's a good point. It's a total control of the word, in addition to being limited to only consuming, we cannot comment on our opinion or refute the lie.
2.
by joken0x 5y ago
Simulations on simulations. How to distinguish the real?
3.
by joken0x 5y ago
The concept of simulation is very interesting, Baudrillard's Simulacra and Simulation and other related theories will gain more strength and meaning.
4.
by joken0x 5y ago
Hahaha we could all be bots here. Bip bip.
5.
by joken0x 5y ago
Goopt is an experiment in what the "procedural web" could be. This new web will use procedural content generation to create varied content, completely synthetic, since these are generated by algorithms and artificial intelligence.
6.
by joken0x 5y ago
Maybe giving more examples can give a better result, for the case of GPT-3 I kept it to a few examples because of the cost of the amount of tokens. Another option is to improve formatResults to fix more cases of invalid JSON responses. If y
7.
by joken0x 5y ago
Man, how crazy. Continuing like this, they could create their own identification keys for machines and despise us. It seems that in this whole game only they end up winning.
8.
by joken0x 5y ago
That's right, the human creation is and will become more and more a very precious treasure.
9.
by joken0x 5y ago
It seems to be a loop of information from which there is no way out, that devours the information and stirs it among piles of garbage that it generates without stopping. Labyrinth and crypt at the same time, growing and churning more all th
10.
by joken0x 5y ago
AI fighting against AI, everything will be AI.
11.
by joken0x 5y ago
Thanks man! It's a good idea, maybe a similar filter or curator will be needed for the procedural web, but for the dark part of the AI; disinformation, meaningless content, etc.
12.
by joken0x 5y ago
I would like to put it live, although it would be necessary to review the terms to launch it live. If you can make any adjustments that respect the terms, contact me to see it together.
13.
by joken0x 5y ago
* Can you mix procedural and static content? Just the idea of the wiki is interesting here. Perhaps there could be a wiki that stores content in a static way, that is edited by users putting the best content they find on the procedural web.
14.
by joken0x 5y ago
It is something that is still not clear to me, I see the difficulty of the task but also the rapid evolution of AI models. Maybe it will surprise us in not too long.
15.
by joken0x 5y ago
You get it, man, that is exactly the question. It is time to think about the many possibilities, problems, dilemmas, paradoxes, etc. It is very interesting and disturbing at the same time.
16.
by joken0x 5y ago
Exactly, it is inevitable, the traditional web will be diluted with the same garbage.
17.
by joken0x 5y ago
I think that as long as you don't put a live version (where you don't require your own API Key) and you don't misuse the results, there shouldn't be a problem. Even so, it is a good idea to adjust, I'll keep an eye
18.
by joken0x 5y ago
Very good reference. It is a problem that will remain.
19.
by joken0x 5y ago
Yes, I think the same. Search engines try to match what exists (finitely, so it will always be a limitation) of previously created content with our query or need to know, while AI can generate and adjust the answer to what we need or want t
20.
by joken0x 5y ago
I think there will come a point when the traditional internet will also become diluted in artificiality, content from the procedural web will start to creep into the traditional web, and we won't be able to distinguish. It's inter
21.
by joken0x 5y ago
Exactly, content no longer revolves around monetization.
22.
Show HN: Goopt – Search Engine for a Procedural Simulation of the Web with GPT-3(github.com)
235 points by joken0x 5y ago|114 comments
23.
Show HN: Search Engine for a Procedural Simulation of the Web with GPT-3(github.com)
7 points by joken0x 5y ago|0 comments
24.
Search Engine for a Procedural Simulation of the Web with GPT-3(github.com)
2 points by joken0x 5y ago|0 comments