johnatthebar

8 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by johnatthebar 5y ago

   Pretty persuasive! Though also (I think) a pretty good illustration of why developers will almost always try to include some on-site parking even if it's not mandatory. In this case it seems as if they decided that completing construct
2. 2.▲
   by johnatthebar 5y ago

   good short video summary: https://www.vox.com/videos/2017/7/19/15993936/high-cost-of-f...
3. 3.▲
   by johnatthebar 5y ago

   The author's follow-up, Parking and the City, is a mere 534 pages and more readable. (Part of the reason Shoup has been so successful as a policy change agent is that he's a gifted writer.) Still goes for an academic price, unfort
4. 4.▲
   by johnatthebar 5y ago

   Agreed that the recreational biking infrastructure in NW Arkansas is great, but not enough Fayetteville people bike for transportation for that to be a big part of this outcome. It's just 1% of all commutes, for example. Compare that t
5. 5.▲
   by johnatthebar 5y ago

   Folks interested in this subject should consider joining the Parking Reform Network for connections to a bunch of people working on the subject around the world: https://parkingreform.org/