johannboehme

6 ms·

1.
by johannboehme 8mo ago
I just tested it. Only claude Haiku responded like this. Smarter models like Sonnet and Opus said that you would need your car to get it washed.
2.
by johannboehme 1y ago
No, but i really would like a chrome extension to block out all the people complaining about AI on every site.
3.
by johannboehme 1y ago
No, not really. The power button on the galaxy was previously a bixby button. They just changed the assistant that gets called uppon. AI Suggestions in search engines are sometimes practical and you can always choose to ignore them. AI is
4.
by johannboehme 2y ago
Thanks god i live in the EU and not in a late stage capitalist hell hole XD
5.
by johannboehme 3y ago
but there is. VSCode core may be open source, but the plugin marketplace certainly isn't. So if you for example use VSCodium, you don't have access to the plugin marketplace and eather have to use an alternative or manage your plu
6.
by johannboehme 3y ago
hmm.. but you also spent a lot of time to learn programming. Why not invest some time in the use of professional tools? If you master an editor like vim, you'll never need to spend time to learn additional IDEs. In the past i needed to
7.
by johannboehme 3y ago
not really.. vim is easy to extend and adapt. You loose that with only vim mode in vscode. You also loose the ecosystem and relevant core functionality like most vim core functionality like :grep :vim :make, quickfix list, arglist etc..
8.
by johannboehme 3y ago
I dont know.. The argument i read all the time is "i don't want to invest time in vim". But what kind of professional spends hours uppon hours learning his craft (programming), but is unwilling to invest some of those hours i
9.
by johannboehme 3y ago
not just the children :D
10.
by johannboehme 3y ago
It’s something people love to be, but in a world with recorded audio, you don’t need as many musicians as you once needed (and it was actually a fairly common job). > Well, and because people love it, many will still be passionate musici
11.
by johannboehme 3y ago
or when you want immutablity and a functional programming style. or if you prefer manipulating lisp ast instead of wrestling indentation. or if you need somewhat decent performance, or if you need somewhat decent multithreading, etc etc..
12.
by johannboehme 4y ago
But clojure is not meant to be developed statically! It is supposed to be running while developing it. You don't need static analysis if the programm is running and inspectable.
13.
by johannboehme 4y ago
You are wrong. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YR5WdGrpoug Static typing only leads to devs trying to press the real world in stupid arbitrary categories.
14.
by johannboehme 4y ago
I've prepared a boiler-plate response for autistic nitpickers like yourself: https://cdn150.picsart.com/upscale-235459796047212.png?r1024...
15.
by johannboehme 4y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YR5WdGrpoug Static typing is not "obviously good" The comparison is flawed. There are no advantages to driving without a seatbelt, but there are pros and cons to dynamic typing.
16.
by johannboehme 4y ago
It's not necessarily about the time it takes to type the type definitions. static typing leads to developers trying to represent the "real" world in a bunch of categories and arbitrary boxes. Thats not necessarily a good thin
17.
by johannboehme 4y ago
Any widely used modern editor/IDE will have plugins to do the same thing. > True. But i do not want to install multiple several gigabyte sized bloatware gui behemoths apps just to develop some software. Contextual completion as offe
18.
by johannboehme 4y ago
so, we just need better digital competence?
19.
by johannboehme 4y ago
we are talking pictures atm. not videos. I bet you could get as good as SD with two weeks of free time, lots of youtube tutorials and with a photoshop license.
20.
by johannboehme 4y ago
so, don't trust photos you see online? That was i learned as a student 15 years ago when Photoshop was adapted by the masses. Nothing changed, just the tools got even easier to use.
21.
by johannboehme 4y ago
Just to leave some hints for people. - If you don't want to deal with the JVM, Clojure also runs on the Web and .NET. - If you develop with the REPL you don't have compile cycles - Or just use Babashka (no compilation needed)
22.
by johannboehme 4y ago
clojure adoption is slow but still increasing. If you go by this logic any language that isn't the current most trending one is dead. Clojure has it's niche as immutable lisp. That itself has not the broadest appeal but thats ok.
23.
by johannboehme 4y ago
Clojure is definitely not dead. There are active Clojure user groups in most countries (even in my little region) and i still (or even more than ever) stumble uppon cool and exiting projects and libs (e.g. https://github.com&#x2F
24.
by johannboehme 4y ago
1. A cool game comes out. 2. I love to play the game with my adult friends. 3. as the game gets more mainstream attention, more and more kids join in. 4. I have to moderate myself because some stupid parent determined that it's now a &
25.
by johannboehme 5y ago
I Can only recommend it. I am forced to use windows for work. I used it daily for the last year and it's so much better than Powertoy FancyZones .Plus vim muscle memory everywhere, regardless whether i'm in wsl, tmux, vim or windo
26.
by johannboehme 5y ago
Huh. Yesterday i was discussing the slow death of non-browser based UI Frameworks with a colleague and now there is one who wants to make one for my favorite language :) Neat.
27.
by johannboehme 5y ago
Not an answer but an anecdote: I am a long time vim user and wanted to learn clojure. Everyone recommended emacs, because of it's lisp and repl abilities and ease of use. I spent two weeks learning emacs, elisp and the ecosystem. I was
28.
by johannboehme 5y ago
I think this would be really interesting if it wasn't lua only.
29.
by johannboehme 5y ago
yeah.. i never use js template strings because of that frigging unusable backtick character. Ist so hard to type on my layout, that its just not worth it -_-
30.
by johannboehme 6y ago
Can only agree! 360° Videos are not VR! Make it 180_3d or just let it be... Can't count how often i clicked on a "vr" video, just to be disappointed by a 2D Sphere :(

More ›