joeldw

4 ms·

1.
by joeldw 4mo ago
There's a couple of ways to keep state around but they all come down to who pays the incentive to ensure a block remains available. In the same way as posting verification collateral, a node would accept a liveness incentive and post l
2.
by joeldw 4mo ago
Thank you! My initial impetus was a MMO open-world sandbox game where players could leave/join at will. I was also interested in networking being directly p2p, as opposed to having a server intermediary. The tricky part is maintaining
3.
by joeldw 4mo ago
Yes! That's a great model that works well for trusted participants - I'm attempting to build something that doesn't assume trust in any participant; i.e. empowering a node to trust a computation result from an arbitrary peer.
4.
by joeldw 4mo ago
I'm building a P2P distributed computing mesh that runs in the browser. It's a TS library that provides a few things: - A WS + WebRTC mesh - A request/response protocol incentivizing the closest or most efficient peers to res
5.
by joeldw 2y ago
Pump.co | Backend + frontend engineers | In-person 4 days in San Francisco | $150-200k + equity + benefits - We save companies money on their cloud spend (AWS and GCP), and are building additional services around security and cost visibilit
6.
by joeldw 2y ago
Correct me if my understanding is wrong, but there are no crypto transactions involved with arbitrage in the common case. Arbitrage is concerned with the relative price of two assets, for example BTC/USD. There is no bitcoin transfer