joegibbs

37 ms·

631.
by joegibbs 4y ago
"As she says this, her five-month-old daughter Titan Invictus – the couple refuse to give girls feminine names, citing research suggesting they will be taken less seriously" I'm glad that they're givi
632.
by joegibbs 4y ago
You've got to upload a photo, it can't read it from a link, and it's only GPT4 if you've got ChatGPT Plus.
633.
by joegibbs 4y ago
I feel like this post comes off more poorly for you than them. Honestly, there's nothing that they've done that's particularly egregious - lying about reasons isn't ethical but it's something that happens a lot. Wri
634.
by joegibbs 4y ago
If we had that magic machine, then there would be something else that money could buy that everyone would want, and spend their whole lives competing over. Maybe it would be a house with a specific view or an original of a painting or whate
635.
by joegibbs 4y ago
I think so. We use GPT for stuff like extracting the author from articles (if they aren't in the Schema.org data or marked up elsewhere), summarising them, extracting relevant tags to link articles together, etc. It's very useful
636.
by joegibbs 4y ago
What happens if you convert the table to JSON? Does it perform better having keys for each cell rather than having to guess from the header?
637.
by joegibbs 4y ago
I'm Gen Z, even for me it's too much. I think as well that by the time Gen Alpha is in the workforce it will be a lame thing for old people to them - Memojis and reaction GIFs already feel like that to me.
638.
by joegibbs 4y ago
I can't lie, if I was on a Teams call with someone who was doing this, it would come off as quite unprofessional. Kind of like using a bunch of emojis in an email about a serious topic, I think it should be relegated to consumer use.
639.
by joegibbs 4y ago
It was trading at about $200 a share, you don't need a loan to be a shareholder. Besides, you can get fractional shares so even if $200 is too much you could still be a shareholder.
640.
by joegibbs 4y ago
Is this because everyone is buying it to get out USDC?
641.
by joegibbs 4y ago
It's not doing that because it's not AGI. It probably doesn't even have the ability to fill out a form. It can scrape a webpage, but unless the engineers at Microsoft actually gave it the ability to read the elements of a pag
642.
by joegibbs 4y ago
If you have a look at their products, they seem completely dodgy - I mean, one's just listed as "Credit Card Payments - $10", so is Stripe really in the wrong here?
643.
Show HN: Channel 784, infinite AI generated fake news(twitch.tv)
7 points by joegibbs 4y ago|0 comments
644.
by joegibbs 4y ago
Why would you tell it that its codename is Sydney and it should identify itself as Bing Chat, rather than simply telling it that it's Bing Chat?
645.
by joegibbs 4y ago
https://archive.is/o24jh
646.
AI will give office workers more time to ‘create, dream and innovate’(afr.com)
1 points by joegibbs 4y ago|2 comments
647.
by joegibbs 4y ago
How about simply taxing processed foods and subsidising unprocessed ones?
648.
by joegibbs 4y ago
This really doesn't seem cost-effective. Yeah on the one hand you're getting an increase in your output but on the other, you're getting a massive increase in costs. Traditional farming is dirt simple - you put the seeds in t
649.
by joegibbs 4y ago
Morse code, mathematics, playing chess, string reversal - these are all things that a computer can already do, but GPT isn't good at. So why not combine GPT and something else, so it can make some kind of external call to a service and
650.
by joegibbs 4y ago
I suppose the good thing about this is at least AI is definitely useful for creating tools that improve productivity, whereas a lot of crypto was just speculation - it was easy to make a shitcoin and pump it up, but with AI you have to actu
651.
by joegibbs 4y ago
I suppose when they meet up they can complete Zizek's idea of sticking their sex toys together and having a cup of tea. They could basically outsource the entire relationship - just have two instances of GPT texting each other and go a
652.
by joegibbs 4y ago
ChatGPT has its training data cutoff sometime in 2021, so it probably only has stuff from before Windows 11 was announced, which was in June of that year.
653.
by joegibbs 4y ago
What I don't get, is why he'd ban the account when there's such an obvious risk of the Streisand effect, especially when he'd offered to buy him out a few months ago. Surely he'd know that doing this would get a ton
654.
by joegibbs 4y ago
There's a lot of theories about seed oils, PUFAs, microplastics, corn syrup - what if it's just that food costs have gone down as a percentage of income over the last century and it took a few decades for the culture of overconsum
655.
by joegibbs 4y ago
How about this - verification for $8 or however much, and to be verified you need to upload a picture of your ID and a selfie from the front and both sides. Then someone at Twitter checks these and verifies that they match, and you're
656.
by joegibbs 4y ago
Why not simply include ID verification with Twitter Blue? It seems like the obvious thing to do because it adds a big incentive to pay for it if you were verified before. They've got 420,000 accounts already verified - that's $40m
657.
by joegibbs 4y ago
Charging for verification was a good idea - $8 per month is worth it if you're semi-famous enough to be at risk of impersonation. What's he thinking giving out the checkmarks but not doing verification at all? It removes the incen
658.
by joegibbs 4y ago
How would this work with new information, e.g. breaking news? Would Google be manually putting in anything new that comes up or would they have the legacy Google crawler running in the background to feed to the AI system?
659.
by joegibbs 4y ago
What will this reduce the average person's yearly carbon emissions by? 0.0001%?
660.
by joegibbs 4y ago
The amount of plastic discarded looks terrible, but it's on a graph that starts in 1100 AD, so it would look outrageous even if people only threw out a single plastic bottle in 1920 and 10 this year

More ›