joecode

9 ms·

91.
by joecode 17y ago
Either you're going to need tons of cash to pay for tons of servers, or you're going to need to rethink how the data gets used. Is it really completely random access that you need? Or is there some way to pre-process or pre-order it so yo
92.
by joecode 17y ago
Wish it were true, but I don't buy it. The article has a link to the full text. Close to the end of the next paragraph, you see the following: "I believe he is a brave and able man, (applause,)" Looking over the whole text, the use of pa
93.
by joecode 17y ago
Mathematicians typically deal with abstract problems that have no direct relation to human feelings. Novelists, artists, and social scientists typically do the opposite.
94.
by joecode 17y ago
Well, there is: One that doesn't express your viewpoint well, for example. It depends on precisely what you are trying to accomplish in writing it, of course. Mathematical proofs require a lot of creativivty, too. There are many different
95.
by joecode 17y ago
Exactly my strategy, too. Anyone else do this?
96.
by joecode 17y ago
Based on my server logs, it appears there are multiple levels of review. The pattern I usually see is a little interaction after a few days of submitting, then a little more interaction right before approval. In one case, my app got rejec
97.
by joecode 17y ago
Except if you own all the brick and mortar stores you have a monopoly. Even if you just own a large chunk of them (like Walmart), you end up having way too much control over what form free expression can take. That is closer to the situat
98.
by joecode 17y ago
I believe the reason for the apparent contradiction is this: Apple acts as a publicizer for the apps in the app store by letting them into the top-N lists and recent releases. When an "objectionable" app becomes popular, users hold Apple
99.
by joecode 17y ago
There's some truth to that, of course. But I don't think apologies should always be issued, in any circumstances. Coddling people is often annoying. It slows things down and keeps people from being direct with one another. Sometimes
100.
by joecode 17y ago
You are. Just you, tho.
101.
by joecode 17y ago
That's pretty hillarious. But still I think it is useful when you offend a person to try to understand why. If there's something to it, then you apologize, and learn a lesson. But if you apologize wihtout learning anything, your apology i
102.
by joecode 17y ago
No, its not really the same thing. Because there is a very obvious reason that people are upset by that word. My point is merely that you need to explain your reasons, not merely point out your skin color or gender, as if that itself were
103.
by joecode 17y ago
"If a woman tells you that putting giant sexually suggestive images in front of her made her uncomfortable, you don’t get to bicker about that." Isn't this a sexist viewpoint itself? As if a woman's reasoning doesn't matter, just that you