joannahuey

5 ms·

1.
by joannahuey 13y ago
Interesting. We haven't implemented third-party integration, but we'll definitely think about it. Feel free to contact us if you have particular suggestions.
2.
by joannahuey 13y ago
That's a great idea, thanks!
3.
by joannahuey 13y ago
Thanks for the information! It'd be great to chat some more about what you've found out.
4.
by joannahuey 13y ago
Interesting -- we haven't gotten other requests for this change, but we'll keep it on our radar. One possibility would be to add settings for text display that allow people to choose justification (along with font size and other s
5.
by joannahuey 13y ago
We're planning on adding regulations and statutes, and the annotation platform should generally work for these texts as well. As you noted, there's a version control issue, and we're still thinking about the best way to deal
6.
by joannahuey 13y ago
Not crazy at all! But, we think we can get higher quality annotations by focusing on building a community of lawyers interested in demonstrating their expertise (to build their online reputation or get referrals) than by hiring clerks. We a
7.
by joannahuey 13y ago
Glad you're excited! We agree that there's a ton of room for innovation in the area. And thanks for the advice -- definitely a great idea to better understand the market and add to our first-hand experience.
8.
by joannahuey 13y ago
Thanks for asking! At the moment, we automatically link all citing cases and then allow users to categorize them (by negative, distinguishing, and positive treatment) and to write a bit of context explaining how the case is relevant. In the
9.
Casetext (YC S13): New Angle on Legal Research With Wikipedia-Style Annotations(techcrunch.com)
68 points by joannahuey 13y ago|23 comments