jnoring

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jnoring 8y ago

   Fair counterargument. Thanks. I'd still contend it's different from something being bundled with an operating system (as in, a user or PC manufacturer must go out of their way to change it) and something that's tied to anot
2. 2.▲
   by jnoring 8y ago

   ...except in this instance, they didn't break the web . That's what irks me about this attitude you hold, which I think is actually what's rude. This notion that some intern posts an unfounded assertion that attributes mali
3. 3.▲
   by jnoring 8y ago

   I don't work for google.
4. 4.▲
   by jnoring 8y ago

   Author here. I do not work for google. I mistakenly thought that obvious, but clearly it's been misunderstood. And here's where I take umbrage with your response: I'm an engineer. I'm not here to sugar coat shit for pe
5. 5.▲
   by jnoring 8y ago

   Author here. Diplomacy isn't my strong suit, and I don't care if you think me rude. I'm not saying consumers shouldn't have choice. That isn't at all what I'm saying. What I am saying is: Chrome didn't
6. 6.▲
   by jnoring 8y ago

   Author here. That's fair if you feel that way. What I would say, however is "rude" is attributing malice when there is a perfectly reasonable alternate explanation to a story. That's really what I take umbrage with; our