jnoller

53 ms·

511.
by jnoller 16y ago
Interesting; I'm looking forward to comparing/contrasting this with my current favorite - Celery ( http://celeryproject.org/ ) which supports a variety of backends.
512.
Python Internals: Symbol Tables (part 2)(eli.thegreenplace.net)
28 points by jnoller 16y ago|0 comments
513.
by jnoller 16y ago
This is why the TSA checks you for lakes when you go through airport security, in addition to fully body scans and taking off your shoes. Don't let the lakes win.
514.
Python internals: Symbol tables, part 1(eli.thegreenplace.net)
15 points by jnoller 16y ago|0 comments
515.
by jnoller 16y ago
Reading things like this make me think back to all the missed opportunities and wasted time I spent as a kid and teenager. I can only hope I can teach and lead my kid to be better than I am, and was. Good for him.
516.
by jnoller 16y ago
Sorry intel - pandora's box is open, and you can't sue it back to a closed state.
517.
by jnoller 16y ago
This is not the place to file bugs; or vent when things are broken. It's brand new, bleeding edge - your feedback is better sent to the developers. Flagged.
518.
by jnoller 16y ago
This looks pretty awesome, and I think it fills a needed gap in the ecosystem. If I had a web app to publicly host, I'd definitely be giving this a try!
519.
by jnoller 16y ago
To me, as a layman, the documents look pretty damning. Sure, Techcrunch did not have a written contract, but I don't see how the language in those emails from fusion garage can be construed as anything but a conspiracy to deceive/screw Tech
520.
by jnoller 16y ago
jacquesm is completely correct - for example, at the company I currently work for we have very strict policies around this, and also how things are encrypted/etc. We don't want access to user data, files or say - encryption keys. Having acc
521.
Does Speed Trump Quality for Startup Iteration?(readwriteweb.com)
2 points by jnoller 16y ago|0 comments
522.
by jnoller 16y ago
Emacs might be insanely flexible, sure, but at what cost? Bloat? Infinite complexity? Heck, I get frustrated with my VIM configuration sometimes because I forget the less used keybindings when I really need them, and need to go spelunking.
523.
by jnoller 16y ago
Probably, it's really as simple as challenging your assumptions, and striving to be better, or make better things. Hell - it's what drives most entrepreneurs.
524.
by jnoller 16y ago
Nice try; but having more flexibility can be just as damning as not enough. Me, and plenty of others, have found that we know where, say, Python's wall is and accept it or we go around it . The wall I'm talking about is the mental barrier
525.
by jnoller 16y ago
Maybe dislike is too strong in your vocabulary - but in mine it's "things I don't like; and would not cry if they got better/changed tomorrow". I'm not talking about hate here - sure, people are able to uncompromisingly happy (as I am, when
526.
Django-mq - community-managed, unofficial and somewhat more liberal django fork(github.com)
1 points by jnoller 16y ago|0 comments
527.
by jnoller 16y ago
We (mostly) agree then. The non-opinionated stuff makes me 1000x more angry then something silly like lack of class-based views, or the inclusion of GIS in contrib (for Django). I was probably overly sarcastic in my original comment, so for
528.
by jnoller 16y ago
Thanks - I did fall into the acerbic trap though, something I'm not terribly happy with. We all, sooner or later, fall into the trap of #1 though.
529.
by jnoller 16y ago
Yup, also "If you cannot name at least 5 things you dislike about the tools and languages you use you're either in the honeymoon period, or irrational". As I commented elsewhere in this thread; god knows Python/Django/Zope/Etc have plenty o
530.
by jnoller 16y ago
No, I don't have that opinion. Look at my history on my blog, or comment history here. Python, Django, etc have plenty to fix and get right. Your facts are wrong.
531.
by jnoller 16y ago
I was being sarcastic; and if you cannot name at least 5 things you dislike about the tools and languages you use you're either in the honeymoon period, or irrational. This includes fellow python-oriented people. Myself included.
532.
by jnoller 16y ago
I think you and I both know - once you've run with something long enough, you hit a wall. Everything - every language, framework or tool hits a wall. You hit yours with Django because you fundamentally disagreed with some of the design deci
533.
by jnoller 16y ago
And based on the author's previous Django and ORM posts, I look forward to the next post in a few months when the black magic stops working and they begin to hate on Rails as a framework.
534.
PyPy Status Blog: Escape Analysis in PyPy's JIT(morepypy.blogspot.com)
36 points by jnoller 16y ago|0 comments
535.
by jnoller 16y ago
Except that if the Django core developers thought that using Git, mercurial, or github would grossly improve their workflow, don't you think they'd use it? They may be perfectly comfortable with their current tools - we agree though, this
536.
by jnoller 16y ago
Why not just have Disqus sponsor the DSF/Django core. Forking it is exceedingly short sighted.
537.
by jnoller 16y ago
Actually, we're far from "one framework" - just because one has a lot of mindshare doesn't mean we have like 30 of them floating around. Web.py, Django, Repoze, Flask, on and on and on. I think writing a python web framework is a rite of pa
538.
by jnoller 16y ago
Isn't the logging system being fixed in 1.3?
539.
by jnoller 16y ago
Just because python packaging sucks doesn't mean Django should drop it's "design integrity" just to throw things in people "really feel the need for". Otherwise Django bloats, gets complex and to big to deal with, and it goes the way of Zop
540.
by jnoller 16y ago
Anyone can contribute to Django right now; just like anyone can contribute to Rails. Only a group of core maintainers can merge those contributions into a core, shipping release. So how does the DVCS make that core think, work or release an

More ›