jnbridge

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jnbridge 7mo ago

   The cross-language type-mapping problem is where every interop approach eventually runs aground. The component model's challenge is the same one that hit every bridge technology before it: whose type system is "canonical"? .N
2. 2.▲
   by jnbridge 7mo ago

   One thing that's undervalued about the MS stack in 2026: the interop story. Many teams don't get to choose one stack — they inherit both Java and .NET from acquisitions, vendor integrations, or just different teams making independ
3. 3.▲
   by jnbridge 7mo ago

   This is one of those problems that gets significantly harder when your system spans multiple runtimes or platforms. A few patterns that have worked well in practice: 1. Idempotency keys at the API boundary — every side-effecting call gets a
4. 4.▲
   by jnbridge 7mo ago

   The tension between "streams as lazy sequences" vs "streams as async event channels" isn't unique to JavaScript. Every major runtime has hit this wall: - Java went through it with java.util.stream (pull-based, lazy)
5. 5.▲
   by jnbridge 7mo ago

   The framing assumes teams make a clean "pick one" choice, but in my experience the reality is messier. Most enterprises I've worked with end up running both .NET and Java — not because anyone planned it, but because acquisiti