jmye

6 ms·

31.
by jmye 4mo ago
> I know this particular context was within the WC but the phrasing of the parent comment seemed to go beyond just that and to football tickets in general, which is what set me off. No idea why you would read a comment in a thread specif
32.
by jmye 4mo ago
> Now only rich people get to enjoy a sport meant for the masses, yay. I'm so tired of people trying to pretend that limited tickets to an event billions of people want to attend ought to be available to poor people just because. If
33.
by jmye 4mo ago
> Hard pass until I see some hard data. Are you remotely qualified to understand said data? Or do you, as you did below, just want an easy opportunity to swipe at things you know you lack expertise to understand?
34.
by jmye 4mo ago
This is not a "difference of opinion" and framing it as such is intentionally and egregiously dishonest.
35.
by jmye 4mo ago
> Can someone write an AI 2027 but instead of some totalizing doom propaganda it talks about the bubble unwinding and what we can do to prevent this kind of crap in the future? How do we build an economy and society that’s sustainable? I
36.
by jmye 4mo ago
> it's obviously not good for profits. Weird to think profits matter half as much as ever-increasing valuations, driven by memetic bullshit. E.g. the entire point of the article you're commenting on.
37.
by jmye 4mo ago
> we don't need to do much differently to take advantage of this data anyway. doctors already ask patients what changed recently So your take is we just do the testing and ignore it's outputs entirely, until something comes up?
38.
by jmye 4mo ago
People don't do anything with the data they already have, to your point. Stand on a scale at the same time of day, every day. Track your intake. Track your output. See your PCP for your free AWV-equivalent, and keep an eye on your metr
39.
by jmye 4mo ago
> I think in a more sane universe, we'd be 50-100 years further along into medicine today just by gathering and analyzing more data with the technology we already have. What on earth do you think that load of garble means? "50-
40.
by jmye 4mo ago
> That’s a lot of data really fast, so if you want this 3D scan of your body, yes, you do want as much data as fast as possible. 60 seconds sounds great compared to an MRI that’s going to take 15 minutes minimum & up to an hour or mo
41.
by jmye 4mo ago
What a weird take. You make it sound like their dead children were no big deal, but by god, someone not paying for your children for you is a catastrophe. > And if you died of starvation, welp your responsibilities in life have ended
42.
by jmye 4mo ago
Because new people see it, find it fascinating, and upvote it. As it turns out, in a feed like HN's, it's easy to miss things if you don't happen to see them within a day or so of them being posted. I'm not sure why this
43.
by jmye 4mo ago
This is a deeply silly and patently idiotic false equivalence, but you knew that when you posted it.
44.
by jmye 4mo ago
Or are openly rooting for it because red shirts are better.
45.
by jmye 4mo ago
And he can’t explain a single reason for any of it. Truly the least competent government imaginable. But at least he says things that make idiots feel tough and manly.
46.
by jmye 4mo ago
Millions from specific countries? Over decades, or do you not actually know anything about Canadian immigration? How "often" do they "illegally immigrate to the US"? Come on, be specific. Surely this isn't absolute
47.
by jmye 4mo ago
Ahh, yeah! That rings a vague bell of having to futz with IIS at some point to figure out why a page wasn't working. I can't quite recall if it worked in Geocities, but I think some of the gaming websites I was building (maybe xoo
48.
by jmye 4mo ago
I think it was... SHTML? that allowed for server includes. My recollection from... 25ish years ago was that it was generally quite well supported and worked quite well (and was dead simple to implement). Not sure why, if that was the issue,
49.
by jmye 4mo ago
Yes, ordinary people have famously never killed tens of millions of civilians/undesirables at the orders of the government. Great point.
50.
by jmye 4mo ago
"I know you are but what am I" Unsurprising you're a coward.
51.
by jmye 4mo ago
> he narrative here is completely polluted by people who dislike Elon/SpaceX. Hard disagree. It's polluted by Elon in general (pro and con), just like Tesla's idiotic valuation. But in this case, a pivoted business model f
52.
by jmye 4mo ago
> And no, HN is not social media in any normal sense of the word. That it's less destructive than Meta doesn't make it less "social media" - and I'd argue that it's style (links fall off the page quickly and
53.
by jmye 4mo ago
Have you ever like, read books? Why on earth would you think the title of a piece needs to call to anything but a general emotion from the story? > Wow, that was quite a lot of cryptic build-up. Yes, they were building suspense and telli
54.
by jmye 4mo ago
Any good faith reply would take, as clear, that the issue is not with using a big mixer and that that is not what anyone, on earth, means when they talk about "industrial processing" or "using additives (perhaps not typically
55.
by jmye 4mo ago
I just assume anyone posting it, at this point, doesn't read, doesn't write, or simply isn't clever enough to say anything that's actually worth listening to. Pure noise that won't go away because it makes the teena
56.
by jmye 4mo ago
Very “junior developer who’s actually definitely the smartest person in the building” thing to say in response. If you don’t know, perhaps it’s best to approach with curiosity, and not smarmy, teenage condescension.
57.
by jmye 4mo ago
> Women falsely accuse men of rape and other serious crimes all the time. “All the time” meaning, what, specifically? Is there a reason you added this clear load of bullshit at all, or is it pure “virtue” signaling, for your given brand
58.
by jmye 4mo ago
Reads like "The poor kapos had kids! They weren't evil, they were just upstanding people supporting their families!" Absolute bullshit. > And it’s not like you can walk onto the street and just wave down a morally superior
59.
by jmye 4mo ago
> Is providing for your family and their future not "something good"? No, intentionally giving kids depression and anger issues is not "something good" no matter how many bullshit platitudes someone throws out about t
60.
by jmye 4mo ago
> I don’t want to work for a company that makes kill bots, or can renege on climate pledges. Then don't? How is this a union issue?

More ›