jmye

17 ms·

361.
by jmye 11mo ago
You wouldn’t put your house “in a blockchain”, either. What is it you think you’re saying, here?
362.
by jmye 11mo ago
The currency is absolutely not used by anyone serious as currency . Market caps are, quite obviously, representative of nothing, given the current state of the S&P. Let’s be serious.
363.
by jmye 11mo ago
What specific impact do you think that would have on this study? Do you think vaccines prior to Nov-2021 were safe and they were unsafe after? Do you think short term results, captured after Nov-2021 are more relevant than inclusive results
364.
by jmye 11mo ago
“Why didn’t doctors listen to my completely unsourced opinion in their field?! I can write computer programs, don’t they know that!” You have absolutely no idea what you saw. Sometimes, it’s ok to not have strong opinions about things you
365.
by jmye 11mo ago
> punitive limitations on dissenting speech Rank bullshit or whining that people aren’t forced to associate with others against their will - not sure which basis for your statement is worse.
366.
by jmye 11mo ago
> When I say something like this it usually means… Yes, exactly. This isn’t “do my job for me”, this is “do the job you have, and solve the problems you should be able to solve”. It’s also, at times, “pointing at fires is junior shit - f
367.
by jmye 11mo ago
Yes! Had the same instant reaction to that line. A lead engineer doesn’t get to lock himself or herself in a closet and ignore the team, and any team/company allowing that is failing its team as a result. They should be out there helpi
368.
by jmye 11mo ago
I find myself increasingly concerned that, when not asked to explain their views, people will take vague posts that pretend to be factual as actually factual, because media literacy is basically non-existent. I don’t need to be in a sixteen
369.
by jmye 11mo ago
I suppose I’m not clear what threat someone clinging to debris in the middle of the ocean continues to pose that would necessitate anything other than rescue and detention. It seems, rather, that that’s not happening because the military an
370.
by jmye 11mo ago
Ahh, fair enough, I misread/failed to read the username. Thank you for pointing that out!
371.
by jmye 11mo ago
Are you suggesting that survivors floating on debris in the middle of the ocean were “fleeing”, or is this just useless equivocation and excuse-making? Why is media in scare quotes in your original post?
372.
by jmye 11mo ago
Calling their objections “weirdly vitriolic” belies both a complaint about “kindness”, and shows an explicit desire to not learn a single thing. Perhaps, if you have genuine curiosity in the future, you should be thoughtful about the ques
373.
by jmye 11mo ago
Bad advice, bad information, absolutely. I’m not sure if this is more bad advice, but it seems like we’d all be better off if people just shared their experiences, rather than trying to proscribe them for others: you telling me to decline m
374.
by jmye 11mo ago
Did you read it? Their process is highlighting “interesting” cells, per the article. Human process simply isn’t gone, nor is the “AI” resolving anything beyond “these cells look like other bad cells”. Do you understand the treatment proce
375.
by jmye 11mo ago
That’s an unbelievably idiotic error for a person to make. It doesn’t even make sense in the literally/figuratively context. Something that stupid wouldn’t appear in a third grader’s book report. Come on.
376.
by jmye 11mo ago
DEI “bureaucracy”? Love when people who don’t know what DEI even is are nevertheless determined to use it as a bludgeon. Almost as hilarious as when angry men whine about whatever the fuck “gender ideology” is.
377.
by jmye 11mo ago
And yet you can “just write some code” and weapons a generation of young men, and cause an incredible increase in depression in a generation of young women. Pretending code has no direct and obvious impact is rank naivety.
378.
by jmye 11mo ago
> A Principal Engineer should be just as valued and well-treated as a CTO. Most companies fail to do this, so everyone wants to be the CTO. Establish a career track, where technical people aspire to technical positions. 100%. I’ve had to
379.
by jmye 11mo ago
If your entire job, as a VP or director/manager, is getting progress reports, you’re probably a wildly shitty manager and ought to be replaced anyways. Seems more like the kind of thing a “smartest guy in the building” dev believes t
380.
by jmye 11mo ago
Congrats, Trump voters, you’re getting exactly what you specifically voted for. Revel in it. Hardened criminals, here, while ICE refuses to go after anyone vaguely dangerous. Well done. Peter Thiel is proud of you.
381.
by jmye 11mo ago
I don’t know how to ask this without it seeming like snark, but as genuinely as I can ask (and with the assumption that we otherwise agree there should just be a door): Why don’t you just turn on the heat in the room?
382.
by jmye 11mo ago
Anyone talking a job at Meta knows the entire point of their job is to make young men angry, and young women depressed. And they do it anyway, because they expressly agree with those outcomes as long as it pays them an exorbitant salary. Bl
383.
by jmye 11mo ago
“Their own citizenry” vs “our citizens” Come on. This is just rank dishonesty. Nothing else you said is worth a response.
384.
by jmye 11mo ago
I directly responded to your whining about “action” - I’m sorry that you now want to have a different conversation because you realized how utterly incorrect you were, but I’m not interested in asinine purity bullshit from some “Enlightened
385.
by jmye 11mo ago
Are you under the impression that CMS doesn’t address fraud and overpayments with extremely harsh penalties, every single time they’re found? Do you think CMS just shrugs and oks every single test? I don’t understand the basis for your comp
386.
by jmye 11mo ago
They directly increased access to healthcare and infrastructure funding in the last 15 years, and both were very obvious, big bills. Perhaps it would behoove you to actually pay attention, instead of memeing online about things you don&#x27
387.
by jmye 11mo ago
Would be hard to roll my eyes harder. I get not wanting to respond to the substance, but maybe I can help: Do you advocate 'not restricting' murder? I assume not, which means you recognize that there's some point where your p
388.
by jmye 11mo ago
> to take up arms against our citizens Why are you changing your words? > against their own citizenry Germany, 1930s. Cambodia, 1970s. > You mention Kent State, but that actually illustrates to my point. It flatly doesn't. US
389.
by jmye 11mo ago
Of course, “we shouldn’t restrict things I like because they definitely don’t matter for… reasons.” I think the free access to that information in those cases is an exacerbating factor that is easy to control. That’s really not as complic
390.
by jmye 11mo ago
I did. There is no “good side”. My grandma had blue numbers tattooed on her arm to prove it. The idea that armed citizens would universally rebel on the same side is also utterly delusional. Y’all need history books.

More ›