jmye

23 ms·

391.
by jmye 11mo ago
> every military person (if so ordered) would gladly take up arms against their own citizenry as well as every military weapon system would be utilized against the people. Perhaps you should look up the literal thousands of occasions o
392.
by jmye 11mo ago
You don’t think there are any issues with, say, an AI client helping a teenager plan a school shooting/suicide? Or an angry husband plan a hit on his wife? Does everything have to rise to a national security threat in order to be undes
393.
by jmye 11mo ago
What? They make the computer chips you use. That is your problem. What a bizarre post.
394.
by jmye 11mo ago
Moving into Apple, given the potential risk/uncertainty in a new CEO and no real new revenue streams, is an interesting choice. I guess maybe it feels relatively safe? But even then, if there's any real downturn, they seem pretty
395.
by jmye 1y ago
Some of those items were about feeding starving kids, others weren’t. Perhaps we shouldn’t pretend that anyone equating them is saying something worth listening to or taking remotely seriously. Ahem.
396.
by jmye 1y ago
> I would also keep in mind that the 180k number is almost certainly inaccurate Right? Why is anyone taking this as a good faith number, let alone a fact, given who said it and where it was said? It’s quite clearly made up nonsense.
397.
by jmye 1y ago
My man, you kicked this off with "women are all DEI hires" and now you're doubling down with fact-free bullshit you're trying to pass off as "real historical facts". 1. What, specifically, was "DEI Frenzy&
398.
by jmye 1y ago
And yet, you do need meshing to know whether or not they have work authorization. Would recommend taking a minute to really think about what people are saying to you, instead of jumping to asinine, teenage bullshit like "excuse den
399.
by jmye 1y ago
> Another curious thing is despite how the US has been acting in this manner, their stock market still continues to outperform everybody else's Only a tiny fraction of the S&P is performing, and it's because it's eithe
400.
by jmye 1y ago
> Tell me why we should care about some island on the other end of the world. I mean, if we're talking about Taiwan, it has strategic and commercial importance above and beyond being "some island". Certainly more than Cent
401.
by jmye 1y ago
> But didn't women benefit from DEI? I see some workplaces and occupations completely woman dominated locally I'm not sure what you're asking, here. Do you think all of those women are only in those positions because of &q
402.
by jmye 1y ago
> The implication that title and intro mean to imply is working for companies that build products that are [...] hostile to their users. But the call to action is to.. embed logic in the programs to pluralize properly (in English). So it
403.
by jmye 1y ago
It’s unconscionable that we won’t even regulate the worst parts of it (prop betting) or consider that letting millions of young men gamble on their phone might be like, a bit harmful, societally.
404.
by jmye 1y ago
Starbucks, KFC, Chipotle as well. So like, pretty widespread "beyond (my) personal bubble", to answer GP's question.
405.
by jmye 1y ago
Anyone who supports this is anti-American, full stop. Moreso when they then play dumb about why people support getting rid of ICE entirely.
406.
by jmye 1y ago
I think you’re generally correct about the function (“the press” is both Joe/Jill Journalist and the NYT), but I think you’re giving GP’s comment a much better reading than I can.
407.
by jmye 1y ago
I have no idea what that has to do with my comment or the one I responded to. The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the first amendment. The NYT doesn’t suddenly lose “rights to it” if it’s not seen as a person. “Corporate personhood” i
408.
by jmye 1y ago
I'm curious what you think "Congress shall make no law [...] abridging the freedom of [...] the press" means, in this case. Did you just not know what the actual text is, or ... ?
409.
by jmye 1y ago
It certainly isn't Peter Thiel, Alex Karp or JD Vance. Nor is it the vast majority of "big tech" who have all undeniably made the world significantly worse for a few extra advertising dollars. But, hey, I'm sure all th
410.
by jmye 1y ago
What a disgusting response.
411.
by jmye 1y ago
> Would you want to be the one kid in school who’s not online? I mean, who cares what the kid wants? It's your job as a parent to be a parent. Sometimes that means telling your kid no, even if that means they're not your best f
412.
by jmye 1y ago
> What if they asked about "Italian numerals", "Turkish numerals" or "Turtle Numerals"? None of those are real things. "Arabic numerals" are a fundamental concept that, at one point, were quite cle
413.
by jmye 1y ago
At some point, every person who says the words "free" and "speech" consecutively (especially in such a smarmy, snotty way), needs to understand that it's not a shield from criticism nor an obligation to continued as
414.
by jmye 1y ago
Only if you fundamentally ignore like, exceedingly basic macro economics.
415.
by jmye 1y ago
.... That's not a justification. That's an explanation of how our system, in reality, works. Also, "the real alternative is a completely hypothetical, made up universe" is bizarro nonsense. In the actual, real world, tha
416.
by jmye 1y ago
"Explanation" and "justification" are not synonyms, even if you just want an excuse for a Twitter-esque slap at Americans.
417.
by jmye 1y ago
I am proposing that, rather than putting your family's life at risk because you're bothered that your wirelessly connected device doesn't connect to your car particularly well, you prioritize your family's life an pull o
418.
by jmye 1y ago
> ACA is a failure and the only thing it did was make it mandatory and unaffordable at the same time. This is absolute, unequivocal bullshit. I get that you aren't under 26, that you don't need subsidies, never were denied cove
419.
by jmye 1y ago
This isn't really responsive to the conversation, here. OP was complaining about having to fiddle with his device and putting his family at risk. I have no idea what you think you were responding to, but it wasn't that particular
420.
by jmye 1y ago
> OTOH, Trump just straight up lied to them. He said he'd protect their jobs, but coal jobs in his first term continued to decline at the same rate they did during Obama's. He did nothing for them. Populism in a nutshell. Those

More ›