jmcnevin

7 ms·

31.
by jmcnevin 16y ago
I'll be that guy. breath = noun breathe = verb "Breathes" New Life That is all. :)
32.
by jmcnevin 16y ago
There's a number that do... and apparently you can install transmission as an add-on to dd-wrt: http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Optware#Installing_torr...
33.
by jmcnevin 16y ago
Being in that majority of people who haven't built Twitter-scale systems in the past, could someone explain to me why Twitter is moving to a new form of twitter ID in the first place? What is wrong with their current system? Also, it seems
34.
by jmcnevin 16y ago
What you've described here would make an AWESOME movie. Granted, I'm not sure how one would work "Datacenter" into the title and still sell many tickets.
35.
by jmcnevin 16y ago
Yawn. Wake me up when these photographs are re-released in 3D.
36.
by jmcnevin 16y ago
I think a lot of the discussion here is boiling down to this statement in particular. Maybe you don't interpret "None of your business" as impolite, but when I hear it, it's usually a snippy reply to someone being too nosy. It's actually
37.
by jmcnevin 16y ago
Swarmation: AKA "You IDIOTS, move over HERE!" Not that it isn't fun. :)
38.
by jmcnevin 16y ago
There was an OS X app that does something similar to this called Billable, but they recently renamed the app Profit Train. Not sure if that's something that should be on your radar or not as you move forward.
39.
by jmcnevin 16y ago
Oh really? I heard from a writer that emacs is the best word processor. http://artlung.com/smorgasborg/C_R_Y_P_T_O_N_O_M_I_C_O_N.sht...
40.
by jmcnevin 16y ago
I want that octocat plush doll.
41.
by jmcnevin 16y ago
I have to agree here. It seems like every other day there's a new Stack Overflow subdomain or copycat site. Is this really "news"? On another note... when you have a different SO site for every topic under the sun, isn't there some worry
42.
by jmcnevin 16y ago
How does this differ significantly from something like TinyMCE? From what I can tell, it's still using contenteditable. I'd be interested in seeing an open implementation of the editor Google is now using with Google Docs, where they compl
43.
by jmcnevin 16y ago
Looking at the source, there's no html, head or body tag in the document (but there are CSS styles referencing the body tag, hmm). This could be some minimization trickery that assumes most browsers can deal with malformed html documents, b
44.
by jmcnevin 16y ago
Maybe a bit off topic, but every time I read a thread like this, it leaves me wondering why people in the US are so reticent to discuss actual solid numbers regarding how much money they make, but do everything to dance around real figures,
45.
by jmcnevin 16y ago
Three links to the same blog on the HN front page. Does this stink to anyone else?