4 ms·
Looking at the source, there's no html, head or body tag in the document (but there are CSS styles referencing the body tag, hmm). This could be some minimizat
by jmcnevin 16y ago
Looking at the source, there's no html, head or body tag in the document (but there are CSS styles referencing the body tag, hmm).
This could be some minimization trickery that assumes most browsers can deal with malformed html documents, but [slams fists on table] IT'S NOT RIGHT, I TELL YOU!
- sramov 16y agoFeel free to put it through W3 validator, it is perfectly valid HTML5 (but the same can be done with 4 too).
- stevepi 16y agoThis is not a valid document according to http://validator.w3.org/ http://validator.w3.org/. I suggest you run it through and see for yourself. As a design/technology exercise, this is interesting, but it is not usable in any real-world application.
- sramov 16y agoValidator is having hiccups ATM. It is valid, trust me. Try later. If you don't believe me, try some other pages, including the W3 one itself, they all come out as invalid. Edit: The validator works now.