jlorentz1

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jlorentz1 20d ago

   > To what end? To chase AGI, of course! An "open" lab does not have to stay open forever. Are you confident that a step change in open source is unlikely? The industry seems to disagree, considering billions are being spent on
2. 2.▲
   by jlorentz1 20d ago

   Enterprises absolutely care about benchmarks (especially internal ones, but the headline benchmaxxed ones too), and the Ant coding thing is a great example. How long did that last again? A few months? Illustrates my point perfectly. Switchi
3. 3.▲
   by jlorentz1 20d ago

   Two big differences are low switching costs and a higher rate of innovation.
4. 4.▲
   by jlorentz1 20d ago

   1. They absolutely would, eventually, if open models surpassed Ant & OAI's flagships. Keep in mind "surpassed" encompasses both output quality and cost-saving architecture innovations like DSA, which may not be possible t
5. 5.▲
   by jlorentz1 20d ago

   If they stop racing, the wave of open models will pass them and their inference margins will drop to zero. A realistic model of their operating costs surely must include ongoing training.
6. 6.▲
   Show HN: Sirius – A type system for array programming(sirius-lang.org)

   2 points by jlorentz1 24d ago|0 comments
7. 7.▲
   by jlorentz1 1mo ago

   I'm similar strength (4k ogs) and I had the same experience. I think the essential difference is the cross-cut in this game can produce 3 groups (a connection on the shorter axis remains), whereas it produces 4 in Go. That makes it pos