Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jlivingood
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
jlivingood
10mo ago
For folks following this here - node and neighborhood look clean. The issue appears to be a failing cable modem (MB8611 - they seem to suffer frequent disconnects when they fail). We have suggested the customer replace the modem ASAP and we
2.
▲
by
jlivingood
3y ago
Several D3.1 modems support it now but most will need to be updated. Many of the vendors have been testing at quarterly L4S interop events, so I would expect them all to have production grade s/w next year.
3.
▲
by
jlivingood
3y ago
UTP is intended to be less than best effort priority. This is about all the apps trying to share queues at best effort (1 level up).
4.
▲
by
jlivingood
3y ago
I wrote a simplified summary of the IETF specs FWIW: https://github.com/jlivingood/IETF-L4S-Deployment/blob/main/...
5.
▲
by
jlivingood
3y ago
It makes new cloud-based apps realistically & reliably workable - think cloud gaming and cloud AR. It also makes interactive stuff like gaming and video conferencing perform a lot better w/o lag. But really anything interactive (us
6.
▲
by
jlivingood
3y ago
See my comment above - doubt this will happen - rather it will become a differentiator like thoughput.
7.
▲
by
jlivingood
3y ago
100% agree - read my IETF Internet Draft for more on that. :-) https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-livingood-low-latency-...
8.
▲
by
jlivingood
3y ago
> "Not sure where this leads but I guess ISPs will start charging toll for express lanes" Doubtful IMO. I think latency becomes another competitive differentiator, much like throughput/speed is today. (this is a personal c
9.
▲
by
jlivingood
3y ago
It has definitely changed. Looking at measurements on this it seems there is only 1 major transit network doing that, and they are working to fix it.
10.
▲
by
jlivingood
6y ago
> How would this work? A 1st draft of the steering mechanism just posted today for comment at https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-rescorla-doh-cdisco-00.txt
11.
▲
by
jlivingood
6y ago
> Comcast sniffs / records / tracks their user's DNS traffic Actually not only does Comcast say they don't do that ( https://www.xfinity.com/privacy/policy/dns ) but now has signed a contract
12.
▲
by
jlivingood
6y ago
> Why would DNS have "optimized, localized results"? Any content that is CDN-based (which is most content) dynamically responds to DNS queries based on network and geographic location - to support CDN localization. In this way,
13.
▲
by
jlivingood
9y ago
> Why traffic injection instead of mail pieces? I mean, I open all of mine, even the 75%+ that are upsells I don't want, on the off chance one of them will tell me something I need to know. Lots of reasons, including years of experi
14.
▲
by
jlivingood
9y ago
It usually means you are about to get a speed upgrade that will go beyond what your modem is capable of delivering. In that case it is possible you could have a 1st generation 4x4 modem (so it can bond 4 downstream and 4 upstream channels).
15.
▲
by
jlivingood
9y ago
> They emailed my Comcast.net address, which I didn't even know I had. I recommend you add your primary email address. You can do this via the self-service portal. Go to https://customer.xfinity.com/#/settings&#
16.
▲
by
jlivingood
9y ago
> edit: Proof https://imgur.com/lzKBkMs If you look at the far right device you see a non-EOL SB6121. The one on the left that is EOL is the leased one, and the retail one is still allowed. I'm not sure if you have
17.
▲
by
jlivingood
9y ago
An RFC is not always a standard - often they are simply 'informational'. For us, when we wrote the document, it was a way to document as transparently as possible how the system worked so that folks would not need to speculate abo
18.
▲
by
jlivingood
9y ago
> I sincerely disagree, especially as per the report Comcast's own second level confirmed there was no need to replace the modem. I am skeptical of this - maybe we made a mistake in telling the customer that. The people that are sen
19.
▲
by
jlivingood
9y ago
What I meant in the context of that exchange was that the notifications come only after for example multiple emails have not resulted in the device being replaced.
20.
▲
by
jlivingood
9y ago
> HTTPS everywhere is excellent advice I couldn't agree more! That's one of the reasons for example we have supported groups like Let's Encrypt ( http://labs.comcast.com/innovation-fund-spotlight-lets-encry.
21.
▲
by
jlivingood
9y ago
> Exactly. And the response, "we're not trying to sell you a modem, we're just encouraging you to strongly consider buying a new one" is such a hair-splittingly asinine response considering the rather serious breach o
22.
▲
by
jlivingood
9y ago
> Although I disagree with Comcast's method and categorization, it would be interesting to learn what modem the OP was using. We start telling customers that a modem needs to be upgraded when one of two things happen: either they ar
23.
▲
by
jlivingood
12y ago
Great quote!