jki275

8 ms·

61.
by jki275 2y ago
How about Fortran 77"
62.
by jki275 2y ago
Have they ever, in known history, done any of that in any manner one could call effective? Congress is a pile of squabbling children and has been at least my entire lifetime.
63.
by jki275 2y ago
I've personally worked in such a system. I can tell you -- as someone who asked the question often -- that often, the answer is "because we wrote it that way in 1975 and no one has bothered to spend the time to learn how to make
64.
by jki275 2y ago
It appears to be conflating things that may or may not be real with other things that are being misreported in the news and making up sensational stories out of them. Unclassified government networks are mostly connected to the internet. T
65.
by jki275 2y ago
You've never heard of courts? The world does not work the way you think it does at all.
66.
by jki275 2y ago
False. They don't give anything to Google, and I just removed the News app from my phone just to prove it could be done. iOS isn't locked down for "Apple's profit", it's locked down for the users' securit
67.
by jki275 2y ago
Apple can't access the data on the devices. They've spent absolute fucktons of money building their infrastructure that way, and they give up hundreds of millions of dollars that Meta and Google gladly suck up by not monetizing t
68.
by jki275 2y ago
You're not understanding the issue here. The government wanted Apple to backdoor iOS at their command. Apple told the government to go fuck themselves. None of that addresses whether it was technically possible or not. You've mad
69.
by jki275 2y ago
That statement simply isn't true. The government attempted to force them to write a new operating system for them that would allow them to get the data on the phone. This was never about the San Bernardino phone, everyone knew there w
70.
by jki275 2y ago
Anybody can write a subpoena, but Apple is on record as having absolutely no problem telling anyone who does so to go fuck themselves and then backing it up with litigation.
71.
by jki275 2y ago
The data passes through any devices in the vicinity -- but they can't read the data unless they've got the private key to that tag.
72.
by jki275 2y ago
You absolutely do not have to bake wifi creds into an esp32 app in plain text. ESP-IDF provides multiple ways to do this, the way I generally do it is to come up with a wifi AP, serve a web page that allows the user to input credentials, a
73.
by jki275 2y ago
Read the New Testament then.
74.
by jki275 2y ago
That's exactly what they don't do.
75.
by jki275 2y ago
That's not an assumption. It's easy enough to look at what Apple does.
76.
by jki275 2y ago
Wow -- as already posted, this is absolutely false. This is not at all what happened, the iterm2 folks are way more sensitive to their users' feelings than that.
77.
by jki275 2y ago
It's very much the opposite of Apple's brand. Apple simply does not do this.
78.
by jki275 2y ago
That's a really inflammatory way to put "paying a ridiculously low fee to make a bullshit lawsuit go away".
79.
by jki275 2y ago
LM Studio on Mac is your friend. You can choose any model you want, run a server for other tools, or chat direct with the model. It can use either MLX or just plain llama.cpp.
80.
by jki275 2y ago
That's a significant misunderstanding of the NT. Jesus drove the money changers out of the Temple, because they were violating the Temple with their presence and their actions -- preying on poor people there. Jesus' primary messag
81.
by jki275 2y ago
Still does exactly that in Sequoia.
82.
by jki275 2y ago
That claim is absolutely false.
83.
by jki275 2y ago
he has actually cashed out and donated small amounts (30k or so) at least a couple of times already.
84.
by jki275 2y ago
Oh come on, that's not even hyperbole, it's straight out flame bait, and it's absolutely false.
85.
by jki275 2y ago
I've used Thuraya in a region of the world not far from there as well. Globalstar, Iridium, Inmarsat were all available at the time as well.
86.
by jki275 2y ago
That ship sailed long ago. there are tons of satellites that make that completely impossible to control.
87.
by jki275 2y ago
We fought and won a war against the Nazis. imposing one's law on another country can be done by that method of course. Putin doesn't give two fucks what the ICC says. As I pointed out in another comment, issuing warrants that
88.
by jki275 2y ago
They're making noise, but they will absolutely not act on them. That would be a career ending event for many political figures in both countries.
89.
by jki275 2y ago
There is no such thing as "international law" in the way you use the term. There are treaties that countries either sign or do not sign. The US isn't breaking treaties it has signed, at least not in the general case.
90.
by jki275 2y ago
Definitely does not work that way.

More ›