jkempf

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jkempf 15y ago

   "Distributed single point of failure" is the term we use where I work.
2. 2.▲
   by jkempf 16y ago

   Pink Floyd, Megaherz, Eisbrecher.
3. 3.▲
   by jkempf 16y ago

   That's utter cowardice. When someone tells us to shut up or they will kill us, Americans have only talked louder. Our principles have never been free of cost.
4. 4.▲
   by jkempf 16y ago

   I don't see how it's either reasoned or important. All I see is rubbish. Giving Objectivists the benefit of the strongest argument, what the author is saying is that Men Of Industry move humanity forward by virtue of their rapacity. Greed a
5. 5.▲
   by jkempf 16y ago

   I for one welcome our new anarcho-capitalist overlords. I'd like to remind them that as a anonymous internet personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves. Really, I'm not sure what to say to t
6. 6.▲
   by jkempf 16y ago

   I use the Birthday Paradox when I'm searching for matching socks in the morning -- rather than pick a sock and look for one that matches it, I accumulate socks and choose the first pair that match.
7. 7.▲
   by jkempf 16y ago

   In short, it seemed that the proof was flawed at a meta-level -- there were certain results, such as that k-SAT has different behaviors (or tractability) at k < 7 and k >= 7, that the proof failed to explain or incorporate. The cons