Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jk2faster
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
jk2faster
7y ago
Here you go: https://telegra.ph/Opinion--China-Tries-to-Teach-Trump-Econo...
2.
▲
by
jk2faster
7y ago
I've long deleted my Facebook account. Tried LinkedIn recently, thinking it won't suck much time and will be a bit more privacy respecting than Facebook and the like--but boy was I wrong. I found LinkedIn more aggressively attenti
3.
▲
by
jk2faster
7y ago
StartPage does it with Google and is explained here: https://support.startpage.com/index.php?/Knowledgebase/Artic... So it is probably possible.
4.
▲
by
jk2faster
7y ago
You're right, privacy is not their selling point. But they do have many phrases like "We don’t store your searches permanently" and "We don’t sell your data to advertisers" in their website, which are technically tr
5.
▲
by
jk2faster
7y ago
>Explain why you believe that's a negative? If you use Bing normally they would know your IP as well I'm a bit uncomfortable in letting MicroSoft associate my IP with what I search daily. I use GitHub and Linkedin and most of t
6.
▲
by
jk2faster
7y ago
I use DuckDuckGo and StartPage. StartPage uses Google's result without sharing user IP( https://support.startpage.com/index.php?/Knowledgebase/Artic... ). I think ecosia can do something similar to that and I w
7.
▲
by
jk2faster
7y ago
It is not. I've been using DuckDuckGo before switching to them, for me privacy is a big deal. When I first saw ecosia, I thought it was similar to DDG in terms of privacy(Probably because they had pro-privacy phrases). I know it's
8.
▲
by
jk2faster
7y ago
I used ecosia for a period of few months, and stopped when I read this their privacy policy( https://info.ecosia.org/privacy#privacy-policy-section-7 ): > For example, when you do a search on Ecosia we forward the followin
9.
▲
by
jk2faster
7y ago
Indeed, there seems to optimal times for posting: http://hnnotify.leknarf.net/
10.
▲
by
jk2faster
7y ago
The 17-Year old bug linked in the article seems to be be fixed: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141061 The problem proposed in the article is that a local html file can access other local files. But the linked(
11.
▲
by
jk2faster
7y ago
There are many easy to use libraries specific to different languages(like https://www.phpcaptcha.org/ for php) and frameworks. These are not as secure as recaptcha, but in most cases does the trick. There are also services
12.
▲
by
jk2faster
7y ago
No, it is similar to recaptcha -- users select pictures to given description. In case of recaptcha, the work is free labor to google whereas in this case, it is paid to the site owner.
13.
▲
by
jk2faster
7y ago
Yes, it is out of 1. From https://developers.google.com/recaptcha/docs/v3 , > reCAPTCHA v3 returns a score (1.0 is very likely a good interaction, 0.0 is very likely a bot).
14.
▲
by
jk2faster
7y ago
And it'll only get worse. From the article: > "If you have a Google account it’s more likely you are human" So, in the future if we don't keep signed into our google account(and let google know every article we read a
15.
▲
by
jk2faster
7y ago
https://hcaptcha.com/ seems to be a viable alternative. If you are a developer, please consider using something other than reCaptcha. Not only is it annoying, but a privacy nightmare as well.
16.
▲
France to propose new tax on flights in Europe
(phys.org)
1 points
by
jk2faster
7y ago
|
0 comments
17.
▲
NewPipe – A Free YouTube Client
(newpipe.schabi.org)
1 points
by
jk2faster
7y ago
|
0 comments
18.
▲
by
jk2faster
7y ago
This is a pretty neat beginning :) $('#cal-1').click(function(){ $('#res-1').html($('#in-1-1').val()/100 * $('#in-1-2').val() ); $('#res-1').show(); });