Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jjulius
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
25 ms
·
421.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
>This means that the "small internet" for any given niche is very, very small, even compared to what it would've been a long time ago on a vastly smaller internet. This has been my lived experience with a few places the pa
422.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
Additional tangential (certainly not helping to answer the question but I can't resist an opportunity to share) shout outs to Warmth (and his ARCHIVES record label), and the Deep Breakfast Series (I love the entries from Owl, Clearligh
423.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
Social impacts don't need to be tied to money. Getting together with your friends and playing/creating music together, with/for yourselves, and for no financial gain is of tremendous value, for instance.
424.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
As someone who is into producing visual and musical art for no monetary benefit, and happens to do a lot of backpacking and is very into the geology of the areas I backpack in, yes. I would absolutely find great value in something akin to
425.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
>Art without money is madness. ... wha? ... huh? I've created so much art in my spare time, for the sheer love and joy of it. It's done for me, but I've shared it with friends and family and they've also greatly a
426.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
HN frowns upon griping about downvotes, and encourages a discussion around why someone's point or rebuttal might be wrong. Just sayin'...
427.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
>Except it wasn't. [cough] >Screenwriter Bob Gale confirms long-standing fan theory that Marty’s nemesis in the trilogy was modelled on the Republican presidential candidate >“We thought about it when we made the movie! Are yo
428.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
>... humanity will... Might*.
429.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
Just a simple acknowledgement that I am aware that my comment is unconstructive and goes against the desire/rules of this space. If I'm going to be an asshole, I usually try and acknowledge that I'm aware of it.
430.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
>I expected a repeat of his first term. Which honestly was quite uneventful. This is not. They were quite candid with their intent. Aside from him casually/flippantly brushing off Project 2025 during his campaign (when it was clear
431.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
I listen to sad songs with great regularity and jam the hell out to the sheer musicianship within, actually.
432.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
Two seemingly opposing ideas can, in fact, be true at the same time.
433.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
>I hope Americans still have the faith they used to regarding Apple. Looks like we'll be trusting their judgement quite a bit going forwards. With stuff like this, why should we extend them trust?
434.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
You're not missing the performance. It's playing right now, and will play your entire life. You just don't get to see what comes next, how it changes, and how it ends. Just like life.
435.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
My father-in-law has openly admitted that the reason they're his favorite team is because they have the most money. Verbatim.
436.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
>Please don't complain that a submission is inappropriate. If a story is spam or off-topic, flag it. Don't feed egregious comments by replying; flag them instead. If you flag, please don't also comment that you did.
437.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
There's a lot to be said for how abuse was portrayed in Twin Peaks. Many survivors of abuse have praised the show and it's film counterpart for their honest portrayal. Sheryl Lee, the actress who portrayed Laura Palmer, has highli
438.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
>Obsessed with compassion and how to create happiness for others... "One of these things is not like the other..." It's almost like you haven't even stopped to understand his work. There's far more compassion in
439.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
And if we needed more, here's Rubio calling it a "big mistake". https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/26/us/politics/rubio-signal-...
440.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
>The information Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth disclosed in the Signal chat of top Trump national security officials was highly classified at the time he wrote it, especially because the operation had not even started yet, according to
441.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
>But I'm kinda surprised why he "hasn't a clue" that the answer to that question is a clear "yes." The whole point of school is to teach kids to use their brains, and reading something complicated, understan
442.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
Upvoting this because I don't think it's fair to downvote someone for trying to understand why something might be more important than they otherwise would've thought.
443.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
Are they dismissing it, or are they just ignorant (which is totally OK) and need to be shown the way? They've literally asked if it's "really important", perhaps we could answer that question?
444.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
>He said he witheld [sic] sensitive information... You said, two minutes ago, that he published the messages[1]. I don't know that you're arguing in good faith here. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43478
445.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
>He was questioned if the event was a "huge mistake", and answered "No." He then proceeded to, a few sentences later, admit that it was a mistake. Edit: Regarding your edit, I saw the clip earlier. He absolutely admit
446.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
>There was no classified data transacted. Have you seen the full conversation yet?
447.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
>The current state of AI makes coders significantly more efficient and it's only getting better. Do you have any data that supports this assertion and the associated upward trend?
448.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
... worry ?
449.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
>Meta said: “We fundamentally disagree with the claims made by Ms O’Carroll. No business can be mandated to give away its services for free." The problem is that it's not entirely clear to most users that it's free because
450.
▲
by
jjulius
2y ago
>Disabling biometrics the whole time you're in the US is a bit extreme... How on Earth, in any situation, for any reason, can inputting a PIN instead of using your fingerprint be considered... "extreme"?
More ›