4 ms·

>He was questioned if the event was a "huge mistake", and answered "No." He then proceeded to, a few sentences later, admit that it was a mistake. Edit: Regar

>He was questioned if the event was a "huge mistake", and answered "No." He then proceeded to, a few sentences later, admit that it was a mistake. Edit: Regarding your edit, I saw the clip earlier. He absolutely admits it was a mistake after Ossoff asks him. Right here - https://x.com/Acyn/status/1904567023923089696 https://x.com/Acyn/status/1904567023923089696 And if you're gonna lament people lying, at least get your house in order first[1]. >The journalist published the messages. This is patently false. As of the time of my making this comment, Goldberg has still withheld the messages containing the details of the plan of the attack. [1]https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43478553 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43478553

thomquaid 2y ago
CIA director explained that nothing could have been classified because classification authority rests with the secretaries involved themselves. In the journalists opinion, war plans should be classified. Fortunately, we dont rely on Journalists to make that determination. Fortunately, good journalists do not harm air missions. Unfortunately, bad journalism creates political illusions. The journalist said he withheld sensative information that the senate hearing today emphasized was regarding an ongoing investigation, and not about war plans. If the whole government is lying, hopefully the journalist is good and publishes facts instead of opinions Edit: in your clip, CIA director says 'they characterized it as a mistake', not 'he'.
- jjulius 2y ago
  >The information Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth disclosed in the Signal chat of top Trump national security officials was highly classified at the time he wrote it, especially because the operation had not even started yet, according to a US defense official familiar with the operation and another source who was briefed on it afterward. https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/26/politics/the-atlantic-publishes-signal-messages-yemen-strike/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/26/politics/the-atlantic-publish...
  - jjulius 2y ago
    And if we needed more, here's Rubio calling it a "big mistake". https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/26/us/politics/rubio-signal-chat-mistake.html https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/26/us/politics/rubio-signal-...

thomquaid 2y ago

CIA director explained that nothing could have been classified because classification authority rests with the secretaries involved themselves. In the journalists opinion, war plans should be classified. Fortunately, we dont rely on Journalists to make that determination. Fortunately, good journalists do not harm air missions. Unfortunately, bad journalism creates political illusions. The journalist said he withheld sensative information that the senate hearing today emphasized was regarding an ongoing investigation, and not about war plans. If the whole government is lying, hopefully the journalist is good and publishes facts instead of opinions Edit: in your clip, CIA director says 'they characterized it as a mistake', not 'he'.

jjulius 2y ago
>The information Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth disclosed in the Signal chat of top Trump national security officials was highly classified at the time he wrote it, especially because the operation had not even started yet, according to a US defense official familiar with the operation and another source who was briefed on it afterward. https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/26/politics/the-atlantic-publishes-signal-messages-yemen-strike/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/26/politics/the-atlantic-publish...
- jjulius 2y ago
  And if we needed more, here's Rubio calling it a "big mistake". https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/26/us/politics/rubio-signal-chat-mistake.html https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/26/us/politics/rubio-signal-...