jipsom

4 ms·

1.
by jipsom 11y ago
I am not sure what you are pointing to or if we disagree. I mean to say the relationship between money and law is that of the moon and its reflection. Not separable but in this way.
2.
by jipsom 11y ago
yes but Nash's point relies on the observation that the process of picking suitable "goods" (or services, or utilities, or stable costs etc.) can be politically corruptible as well. So theoretically the ideal standard lies h
3.
by jipsom 11y ago
So for example if you were going to release a currency unto the world that you wish to be distributed and for the peoples to adopt there are relevant and necessary considerations ( https://thewealthofchips.wordpress.com/2015&
4.
by jipsom 11y ago
Here is the best I could put together: https://thewealthofchips.wordpress.com/2015/05/07/the-levati... My understanding: https://thewealthofchips.wordpress.com/2015/07/09/the-to
5.
by jipsom 11y ago
Nash says something like "even post keyensians" are really just Keynesians, which is funny but also shows how radically and tangentially he is thinking. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Je22xKQekCk Whats most signi
6.
by jipsom 11y ago
Nick Szabo is the person peoples most think programmed bitcoin. 20 years ago he developed smart contracts, which is basically programmable money that uses law as the analogue for its implementation. This is because this is essentially wha
7.
by jipsom 11y ago
there are 10+ lectures and papers on the subject. The very first lecture starts with: >Money can be recognized as a technological development comparable to the wheel and of similar antiquity. Nash proposes we can use science and reason
8.
by jipsom 11y ago
ha me and you dude! but no one else on the net!