jiojk542

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jiojk542 13y ago

   But there now seems to be a police on moral thought. If someone dares to speak against an opinion that the left holds dearly, they're now subjected to having their careers and lives ruined. Don't you think this stifles alternative
2. 2.▲
   by jiojk542 13y ago

   And yet, his views are totally liberal relative to the views you find in some Muslim countries, where homosexuals are sentenced to death or are just killed outright. Why aren't you focused on that, instead of worrying about the definit
3. 3.▲
   by jiojk542 13y ago

   Again... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_balance And why is it "objectively" morally wrong? Who gets to decide this? There is no scientific consensus on the causes of homosexuality.
4. 4.▲
   by jiojk542 13y ago

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_balance Sexual orientation does not equal race. Scientists have never isolated a gay gene. There are no definitive causes of homosexuality. His opinion of homosexuality as a choice is
5. 5.▲
   by jiojk542 13y ago

   "The right wing of american politics is an avid user of and believer in boycotts." Which companies have they boycotted? The recent organized calls for boycotts include Chick-Fil-A, Mozilla, Walmart, McDonald's, etc. I haven&#