Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jhrobert
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
22 ms
·
181.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
I am in the process of implementing my proposal (JavaScript & nodejs). It will take a couple of days I guess. I'll keep the HN community posted. We'll see who's crazy!!! :)
182.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
Given the lack of context, I amssume that, sure, you definitely should have answered "yes, your new haircut is nice"
183.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
I assume you mean "unhappy to discover how dumb they are"
184.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
There is a need for such a service. Anything that is done "in real life" has a purpose that applies equaly "online" There is not point is judging an action by itself, only the consequences matter, but some actions have fairly predictable co
185.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
Am I missing something or is this code defining "global scope" functions whose names include things like a, b, i, p, command, etc...? What are the chances that such global names will collide with something else?
186.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
The Rise of the Hacker News Eco System!
187.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
Humm... is this the longer version of "Don't be evil"?
188.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
"The whole concept behind this is to have a very painless way to parse command line arguments, possibly by losing some flexibility." Is "GNU getopt" painless? I suspect it depends on your definition of "pain", a pro/cons section would have
189.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
Are you sure that "But" is the right word? Thanks for the compliment anyway. :)
190.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
It's a lie. The true reason is purely historical. Editor where just TOO SLOW to handle big files (on DOS they often were limited to 64kb, if not less) Please note that I love "modular code", hence the notion of "sections" in my big file. To
191.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
I am a wordstar guy, I started with CP/M... For years I enjoyed Borland products, they used Wordstar key bindings. And then one day it stopped working. I simply had to use the mouse. I was shocked. It took me years to recover. I hated it. C
192.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
OMG! Is there a way to fake these?
193.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
Please define "email" :) To me, an email is basically an email address.
194.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
Simplify further: Do you have 100k active users.
195.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
To what extend does the "copyright" applies to "derivative work" in software? I am very interested in the answer because I am writing a derivative of the initial Ward Wiki and I'd rather know to what extend I should ask the permission to Wa
196.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
"Worse is Better" says it much better than I can, the dynamics of success are not what we may first think they are. From one point of view, JavaScript is the "Worse is Better" version of Lisp. Guess who's winning? Ditto XML vs JSON
197.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
If one can program a computer, chances are that it would be foolish not to try to sell the result, if only to augment one's "luck surface". A $30 a month EC2 instance can host thousands of users, depending on the service proposed. If a serv
198.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
20 years later, it is definitely true that worse is better. But it will take another 20 years until this reach management.
199.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
When you say "every programming language" I assume you mean "JavaScript"? I would not be surprised if embedding a javascript interpreter and running a validation script was probably already easier in most languages than embedding an XML par
200.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
Impedance mismatch between XML and JavaScript is killing XML. What's next? HTML? {"head":{"title": "JOHN"},"body:"{"div": "Javascript Object Hypertext Notation"}}
201.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
I love the "Particule" concept, a nice extension of atoms (and a much nicer name than "tuple"). Where is it coming from? Without going into Prolog, now that you have some pattern matching, maybe you could have some notion of success/failure
202.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
Come on! by now everybody knows what you're working on! ;-)
203.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
Isn't it the first time in history that a software author makes money like only athletes, writers and artists usually do? Are we going to see the emerge of "software agents", who will help programmers make money out of talent much like "Lit
204.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
It would be cool to navigate by file type sometimes. ie: have some \sound\mp3\all "virtual directory" automatically populated will all the mp3 files of my system. Now that I think of it, it would be cool to be able to express such "virtual
205.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
Sorry, I missed it at the time. BTW I wanted to avoid a double submit and I have been looking for some "search" box without success, it is probably obvious once you know where it is, where is it?
206.
▲
Anic -- Faster than C, Safer than Java, Simpler than *sh
(code.google.com)
187 points
by
jhrobert
16y ago
|
93 comments
207.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
I wish programming was an art and programmers considered artists.
208.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
I wish I were that disciplined... but I have weak will power and basically will keep coding for hours (once started...).
209.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
If Twitter is smart they will provide the smart ultra cheap fast answer: mailto:username@twitter.com with automatic forwarding to your actual email (that they know of already). No brainer. I hope that facebook users will use their twitter
210.
▲
by
jhrobert
16y ago
Well... assuming "vanity" is often a safe bet! But not this time.
More ›