Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jhgb
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
64 ms
·
751.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
The rival's point of view is utterly irrelevant.
752.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
Their burden of proof has already been satisfied.
753.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
No, because you can't prove that it would spread slower among UNvaccinated people.
754.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
> Any state mandate must be enforced through violence or it has no effect. I don't see how that is really true. The state can, for example, refuse to provide you services if you're not vaccinated. If you're not allowed to
755.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
One interesting thing would be to know how much of the performance improvement in some of the compile tests is due to the high-bandwidth memory interface on the M1 chip. Since the M1 chip has both different cores AND a quintuple memory band
756.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
Surely it has a more generic name, then.
757.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
I've basically just said that, e.g., instead of the identifier EmployeeTheNumberThatIdentifiesATupleInARelation, you should really be using the identifier EmployeePrimaryKey. That is, you usually refer to things using the name of the
758.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
> Nobody who cares about performance is doing rendering on a CPU, it's all GPU accelerated. Has OSL already been ported to GPUs? You're implying that OSL users such as film studios "don't care about performance"
759.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
Surely this issue is already explained in introductory programming books. Or at least it used to be, from what I recall.
760.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
It would seem reasonable to me to use the latinized form of the Chinese word as part of the identifier instead of the awful descriptive identifier.
761.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
But if you don't live in an English-speaking country, then "what the creator called it" doesn't even matter. So for the vast majority of people this argument is irrelevant; you generally don't code-switch into Eng
762.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
> You can pronounce any word any way you like to. OK, I'm pronouncing GIF as 'throatwobbler mangrove', then.
763.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
The only one that comes to my mind is antivaxxers selecting themselves out of the population. Not sure if that's what GP has in mind.
764.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
Wouldn't a Raspberry Pi 4 be faster than the old Athlon box anyway? I know that "Reuse, reduce, recycle" is a thing, but still... Reusing an old Athlon for example certainly does not reduce the amount of electricity consumed.
765.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
Perhaps a userscript exists that fixes that? Or even a browser extension? Seems like a reasonable use case for these things.
766.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
That's exactly what SBCL does, for example.
767.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
But the "Use SSH or TLS" interpretation seems to make as much sense as saying "use a square or a yellow" regarding shapes. SSH is not (easily, anyway) a substitute for TLS where TLS is applicable.
768.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
At least systems were smaller then and much better documented, so the effort was at least well supported. Perhaps the quality is correlated with that since you weren't able to squeeze quantity into your work anyway, so your efforts ha
769.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
Rising living standards, for one?
770.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
> - trustless: no participant is assumed to be reliable/honest Shouldn't that be "at least one participant is assumed to be unreliable/dishonest"?
771.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
That thought never occurred to me since I know him as Vergilius.
772.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
When I was 9 years old in Europe, I was walking to school almost two kilometers on my own. And since that age I've never been hauled to any school by my parents using any means of transportation.
773.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
> which was lower but not in a significant way But if "result [was] lower but not in a significant way" means "result was not proven to be lower", how does saying "lower but not really lower" make ever any
774.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
> which need to be preserved That seems to be putting the horse before the cart.
775.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
Wasn't the idea behind this to make most code boring, and have only a small part of it exciting? Just like when structured programming was created, or even local variables introduced, etc. (Of course, the exciting part had to be move
776.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
Sciter currently isn't FLOSS, but you're free to use its dynamically loaded binary distributions.
777.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
Have you tried Sciter?
778.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
Not quite sure how pointing out that similar symptoms are non-specific is "letting our imaginations run free". You can't really tell for sure.
779.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
It was an example, since obviously different uses of energy will have different improvement factors - but major uses of energy have considerable improvement factors. In case of heating, for example, the factor is theoretically infinite beca
780.
▲
by
jhgb
5y ago
Because at some point you'll start tripping over it.
More ›