> Any state mandate must be enforced through violence or it has no effect. I don't see how that is really true. The state can, for example, refuse to provide y

> Any state mandate must be enforced through violence or it has no effect. I don't see how that is really true. The state can, for example, refuse to provide you services if you're not vaccinated. If you're not allowed to enter a government building while unvaccinated without a justification, so as not to endanger the civil servants in that building, I'd hardly call that "violence".