Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jfoster
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
211.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
They all spoke with different voices. It was obvious to most people that they probably were remotely operated. There's several videos (in the article, even!) of people at the event asking them if they are being operated by a human. The
212.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
Not just a hint. Here's a 2 minute video produced by SpaceX called "Earth to Earth". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqE-ultsWt0
213.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
So the claims were: 1. That they will probably get to 0 cases. (he was wrong, but this prediction was made fairly early on when the data looked like this: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1240767096104972289 ) 2. Kids
214.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
What did the post(s) say?
215.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
> X responded by blocking links to the material, claiming that it contained sensitive personal information such as the Ohio US senator’s social security number, and banned Klippenstein from the platform. That seems like a crucial detail
216.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
I wonder if fishing boats need to have a 60 day consultation with the Fish and Wildlife Service before each fishing expedition. It seems to me that fishing expeditions pose a significant threat to the welfare of fish.
217.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
Nice idea. I would probably almost go for that. I wonder how much they could cut from it to make the device you're imagining more appealing from a cost & weight perspective... 1. Front-facing display 2. Battery 3. LIDAR (might need
218.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
That's a very valid point if courts around the world are about to rule against every AI company in hundreds or thousands of court cases. Do you believe that is going to happen?
219.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
OK, but put aside whether you like or dislike this for just a minute or two in order to think about it objectively. You are aware of the way things are trending, right? Is the trend showing any sign that it might reverse, for the rest of hu
220.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
Copyright isn't required once any work can be created faster than you can snap your fingers. It was originally a way to motivate creation of artistic works, since they used to involve a lot of effort.
221.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
What's the threat vector that they are trying to mitigate against? The attack already happened and the vector that the attack used seems to be applicable to any device with a battery. Are they worried about pagers that are affected but
222.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
The visual quality of the Apple Vision Pro is extremely far ahead of any other headset. I generally don't like Apple products and I think they made plenty of mistakes with Vision Pro, but the visual quality is exceptional for our time.
223.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
That's true, but the advantage of having a head start does eventually diminish. They won't catch up to Nvidia in the next couple of years, but they could eventually be a real competitor.
224.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
> 56x the size of H100 but only 8x the performance improvement isn't something I would brag about. It doesn't sound like it's too bad for a 9 year old company. Nvidia had a 20-year head start. I would expect that they will
225.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
From Wikipedia's 1st paragraph: "While consciousness is being aware of one's body and environment, self-awareness is the recognition of that consciousness." From that, I think it's clear that defining self-awareness
226.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
That's like saying "how do you monetize the internet?" There are so many ways, it makes the question seem nonsensical. Ways to monetize AI so far: Metered APIs (OpenAI and others) Subscription products built on it (Copilot, C
227.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
Thanks for the kind comment! Yeah, browser APIs have become a lot better. Between bugs, different behaviour from one browser to another & unusual limitations, there's still a bunch of ways that they're not "all the way th
228.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
How about starting with a decent objective definition? So far, there doesn't seem to be any good definitions that include humans, don't include ChatGPT, and offer clear boundaries on which animals, insects, and bacteria experience
229.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
Unfortunately I don't think there's a browser API for registering keyboard shortcuts that can trigger actions on webpages. I'll make it a PWA soon so that it can at least be added as an app.
230.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
I launched Screen Recorded ( https://screenrecorded.com/en ) a few days ago. It's a screen recorder that runs in your browser. I intentionally made it a super easy choice if you need a quick screen recording by not havin
231.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
Hi HN, I built Screen Recorded as a simple, browser-based screen recorder that doesn’t require any installation or sign-up. I plan to use it for quick screen captures, like product demos/tutorials, but I think it might be useful for al
232.
▲
Show HN: Screen Recorded – A browser-based screen recorder
(screenrecorded.com)
5 points
by
jfoster
2y ago
|
3 comments
233.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
> You're just going to annoy me if you redirect me away to a language I don't want just because you tried being too smart. So what do you propose that such a site shows on their root URL? It's possible to pick a default la
234.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
Google used to have a policy of sites being required to show Google the same page that they serve users. It seems that has been eroded. I'm not sure how that serves Google's interests, except perhaps that it keeps them out of lega
235.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
Roads are 24x7 and outside every building.
236.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
People worried about surveillance but it didn't stop surveillance from happening. I'm not saying to be naive to possibilities, especially as they begin to move from the "possibilities" bucket to the "realities"
237.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
Two things: 1. If you judge new technology by the absolute worst way that it can be used, you are going to spend your life worrying about a million things that will never happen. Focus on stuff that's happening instead of hypotheticals
238.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
Nothing technically objective, just the size that a typical photo can be reduced to without looking bad. It really depends on what you're after, right? If preserving every detail matters to you, lossless is what you want. That's n
239.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
The compatibility gap on WebP is already quite small. Every significant web browser now supports it. Almost all image tools & viewers do as well. Lossy WebP comes out a lot smaller than JPEG. It's definitely worth taking the saving
240.
▲
by
jfoster
2y ago
I work on Batch Compress ( https://batchcompress.com/en ) and recently added WebP support, then made it the default soon after. As far as I know, it was already making the smallest JPEGs out of any of the web compression tool
More ›