Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jevgeni
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
61 ms
·
721.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
COBOL is like HNs shutter shades.
722.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
I've got some negative votes as well. It could be that people here are REALLY into Facebook. Or there might be a slight chance that some of the users here work for FB and are slightly partial...
723.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
Or a particularly enjoyable experience the last two years.
724.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
Why bother with all of this? Why not just stop using Facebook?
725.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
I miss the 90s: the time when you could actually scroll a web page to the bottom.
726.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
I bet Windows 95 is older than you. So, you're OK with communist massacres?
727.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
Matt is brilliant. A little bit more mature and reserved than during his time at Dealbreaker, but still awesome.
728.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
You retire when you hang up your hat and start getting pension. You can keep you opinion, but I prefer the one without brave assumptions about a person I don't know.
729.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
You can spare me the Che Guevara fanboyism. I was born in the Soviet Union and had to read the biography and the history of the Cuban revolution (the soviet version of it, at least). One would think, that having been blessed to be born in a
730.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
:D Zing!
731.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
I'm not knowledgeable about history of the Balkans, so I've actually googled. Tito is traditionally portrayed as a mild and benevolent dictator, because he had a split with Stalin and it was beneficial during the Cold War. However
732.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
I might've confused the gender of your name further down in the comments (not a native English speaker). Sorry for that. :)
733.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
Can you name one example of a communist system, where that metric is so small, it's negligible?
734.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
Name one.
735.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
Why is this drivel on top of HN?
736.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
Just because my initial comment was a short sentence, doesn't mean it was snarky; like this one. And although I agree with your definition within a professional legal context, that context is irrelevant to the discussion, since we are
737.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
I thought "deed-ree" initially. Thank you.
738.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
So she isn't retiring, is that what you are saying?
739.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
It can be compared. Both require to mentally navigate certain set of constraints and rules and build up a mental model of the domain problem, after which you produce a concrete result. In programming it's software, in law practice it&#
740.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
Oh, my mistake. Thanks for pointing that out. Not really familiar with less frequent English names.
741.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
So, when you retire will you immediately stop practicing programming?
742.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
Did you? He's not talking about quitting his job, but his (former) passion. That's not retiring.
743.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
Wow, I'd expect people here to be more empathic towards a person having a career in software engineering longer than most of the lifetimes of the HN crowd (assuming the article is truthful). Instead one gets a bunch of dismissive, I-kn
744.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
So, after a law professor retires s/he immediately stops thinking about law?
745.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
Not his job, but I guess his career choice.
746.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
And assume in the next 300-1000 years nuclear technology stays the same.
747.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
I think this is a good approach. Let the product speak for itself.
748.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
That's a good solution. Additionally, it protects your privacy.
749.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
And if a law does regulate it, the bureaucrat enforcing said law will prosper.
750.
▲
by
jevgeni
11y ago
I respect Robert Schiller a lot. And I think there are legitimate areas where people are being manipulated into buying expensive things (recent news on pharma companies are a good example of this). But the book (as presented in the article)
More ›