Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jevgeni
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
42 ms
·
481.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
Now if they include a way to block modal subscribe-to-our-bullshit-newsletter pop-ups, it would be the world's most perfect browser.
482.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
Yes.
483.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
That’s just shitty leadership. Happens A LOT even without MBAs.
484.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
Yes, exactly my point. Thank you.
485.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
The problems that MBAs are trying to solve are not those at which your average engineer is particularly good. Also, these problems are usually ill defined and not easily testable. On top of that, to "deploy" your solution you need
486.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
While I agree with your point, I don't agree with the idea, that the engineers there are some Dickensian exploited workers struggling to feed their starving family. Those are white collar middle class employees mostly.
487.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
Nowhere in the article has the author claimed that. :/
488.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
The geniuses at HBR never claimed in the article that it applies to chips. The article says that increase in chip performance lead to a prevalent strategy in business (mainly tech) to be the first.
489.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
> Attaching emotional value to math is done incredibly frequently for all sorts of reasons. Writing alarmist articles for clicks being one of those reasons. > Attaching emotional value to technology is also fine. Why??? Doing this wit
490.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
So? He is still attaching emotional value to a technology. You could say the same thing with "machine learning doesn't handle change robustly". Same meaning, different emotion.
491.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
Doctorow is a smart guy, which is why the weasel words he uses seems disingenuous. For example "machine learning is fundamentally conservative, and it hates change". Mate, it doesn't hate anything. It's math.
492.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
Also, aren't facial recognition algos trained on broadly available data sets and NOT on the bunch of developers who are working on it? A sample of on average five people seems to be a dumb way to train facial recognition - whether dive
493.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
Boy, our eyes sure are racist for using light reflection. Also, obviously the difference between the dynamic range of cameras and our eyes play a major part in technical difficulties in multi-racial facial recognition as well?
494.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
I’d think it’s the same reasoning why ISPs aren’t held accountable for piracy.
495.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
I understand being annoyed by religious symbols, but "it's almost as offensive as a swastika"... that's just immensely callous. Especially from a Jewish perspective.
496.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
Aren't you describing exactly the problems types help with? Must be a reason why typed backend developers allegedly don't pay so much mind to: - "proper" naming conventions - JSDOC comments - unit tests - peer review
497.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
Obviously, this is a conspiracy by big solar to inflate their stock prices and to defraud innocent petrochemical execs from their hard earned bonuses!!! Wake up sheeple! /s
498.
▲
AWS Outposts by the Numbers: A Far-Too-Deep Dive into Pricing
(medium.com)
4 points
by
jevgeni
7y ago
|
1 comments
499.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
OK. Umm? Does it matter?
500.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
Thank you.
501.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
Mate, what good is a monarchy if the monarch doesn't have any power? It's just a monarchy in name. Following your logic, North Korea is a democracy, because it has the word "democratic" in its official name. This is a cr
502.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
You peddling horsesh*t is unhelpful. Your fluid goal posts don’t help either. Obviously any U.K. style “monarchies” and republics with a figurehead. Your best bet therefore would be Middle East monarchies, which are obviously a product of t
503.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
They demonstrably do not. Look at any competitiveness index, or standard of living index, or anything measurable. The article you’ve linked is banal. It talks about how monarchies are good at protecting established property rights. Duuuuuh.
504.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
Because if somebody does a bad thing, then everybody can do it, right! /s
505.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
Any trading system? Bittorent?
506.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
Wait, so how is it better than a trusty OpenBSD box?
507.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
His views are all just hand wavey fascism. At no point does he make a tractable argument. As a counterpoint: take all countries today that have functioning (i.e. non-figurehead) monarchies and compare them with democratic, capitalist countr
508.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
Yarvin claimed himself that he is “not allergic to white nationalism”.
509.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
Bad sign if you have to claim your product is not vaporware on your promo page
510.
▲
by
jevgeni
7y ago
Thanks for the heads up
More ›