4 ms·

Wait, so how is it better than a trusty OpenBSD box?

• OceanSunfish 7y ago
  Perhaps the idea is that updates provided by OpenBSD or another OS for example could be compromised or simply directed to an unpopular path, but in this way a "senate" of code reviewers with known biases provides a more democratic way of reviewing updates before publish.
  • iudqnolq 7y ago
    This is incorrect. Urbit has two paths for changes, a vote by the senate or a decision by the developers on the git repo. It only adds more ways of making updates, it doesn't fix the the devs can do anything "problem" https://urbit.org/community/governance/ https://urbit.org/community/governance/