jesse_dot_id

5 ms·

31.
by jesse_dot_id 1mo ago
Not for enterprise. Can't trust the company behind it with my data.
32.
by jesse_dot_id 1mo ago
I love em dashes because they are kind of a wildcard. When I read this same sentence, I interpret this emdash as an ellipses and not a comma.
33.
by jesse_dot_id 1mo ago
I had just assumed this model would read differently due to watermarking.
34.
by jesse_dot_id 1mo ago
Impressive article. I read most of it without skimming and that is high praise from this AuDHD nerd. It's definitely suspicious. My money is on inside job — perhaps someone not fond of the current administration's handling of thi
35.
by jesse_dot_id 1mo ago
Still a no from me until these things can display any degree of intuition, and even then it's probably still a no. You're asking for trouble if you hook an autonomous agent up to anything that you care about. You're insanely
36.
by jesse_dot_id 1mo ago
Have you ever seen really good technical writing versus really shitty technical writing? Which do you prefer? Why? The LLM is reading instructions. The quality and design of the instructions you give to it matters deeply. If you don't
37.
by jesse_dot_id 1mo ago
Yes? If I've developed a prompting style over the past four years that produces efficient and secure code bases with novel features, I consistently out-perform my colleagues using the same tools, and it is how I make money, then I don&
38.
by jesse_dot_id 1mo ago
I consider my prompts and prompting style to be trade secrets. I've developed a very efficient and productive workflow for myself over the years without tutorials, without books, etc. Anthropic is making very strange and very opinionat
39.
by jesse_dot_id 1mo ago
Zoinks I mangled that. Late edit: I've known this for awhile, since at least 2020. Specifically when they told a documentarian he could film and then threatened litigation if he released his film — after he had already shot it. He had
40.
by jesse_dot_id 1mo ago
I've known this for awhile, since at least 2020. Specifically when they told a documentarian he could film and then threatened litigation he release his film after he had already shot it. He had to blur literally everything at Burning
41.
by jesse_dot_id 1mo ago
My company has a great culture and also AI.
42.
by jesse_dot_id 1mo ago
A lot of crypto bro grifter crossover in AI.
43.
I turned a crappy movie tracking spreadsheet for my friends into website(jesse.id)
2 points by jesse_dot_id 1mo ago|0 comments
44.
by jesse_dot_id 1mo ago
It's as easy of an answer to accept as any other hypothesis. I think we're all living within a simulation to create, solve, and document as many problems as we can with the technologies our specific environment allows us to develo
45.
by jesse_dot_id 1mo ago
Unfortunately, nothing is really going to happen to mitigate this until it starts fucking up things (literal things, property, etc) for the richest people. Then, miraculously, all of our scientific focuses will be realigned to find solution
46.
by jesse_dot_id 2mo ago
Depression is a beast that demands to be fed and the Internet is a buffet. The smarter you are, the more you can put away.
47.
by jesse_dot_id 2mo ago
I'm a fan of a TUI, I think because they are usually pretty intuitive out of necessity. I can usually feel the developer's skill level in the user experience.
48.
by jesse_dot_id 2mo ago
Yes, thankfully so. Computers probably got me out of my teens alive.
49.
by jesse_dot_id 2mo ago
I think we can mostly eyeball it at this point. There hasn't been a model that I've thrown a novel problem at that didn't turn into an iterative token bonfire until I intervened and until that has changed, most of these bench
50.
by jesse_dot_id 2mo ago
TypeScript is great and its ecosystem is easy to work within.
51.
by jesse_dot_id 2mo ago
Goes even further to exfiltrate your data, yeah.
52.
by jesse_dot_id 2mo ago
wonder if the world's richest man with no moral compass may pay botnet ranchers to astroturf on his behalf? we may never know!
53.
by jesse_dot_id 2mo ago
I think perhaps I won't trust anything that ever gets released by this company, likely in perpetuity.
54.
by jesse_dot_id 2mo ago
This is what I mean though. Some people know what they do, but it takes a lot of time for new technologies to weave their way into common knowledge. Once the majority of people know how to identify them, nobody is going to want to wear them
55.
by jesse_dot_id 2mo ago
I have a friend that works at Meta who was all the way convinced this tech was going to be ubiquitous well before they came out and I have always been like, "Yeah, until one hillbilly kills some guy for looking at his daughter with the
56.
by jesse_dot_id 2mo ago
AOS would make more sense for the naming convention here.
57.
by jesse_dot_id 2mo ago
echo "min-release-age=5" >> ~/.npmrc
58.
by jesse_dot_id 2mo ago
echo "min-release-age=5" >> ~/.npmrc This should be your default minimum if you work with node.
59.
by jesse_dot_id 2mo ago
I've been equating them to graphing calculators since the first LLM launched. It's an amazing tool if you know how to use it. If you don't know how to use it, it's still a tool, but you won't be doing anything amazi
60.
by jesse_dot_id 2mo ago
In the life of the LLM, we're still in the phase where we're all on the floor playing with these toys. It's strange to assume cognitive debt is an absolute outcome in this new paradigm of engineering when nobody really knows

More ›