3 ms·
I've known this for awhile, since at least 2020. Specifically when they told a documentarian he could film and then threatened litigation he release his film af
by jesse_dot_id 1mo ago
I've known this for awhile, since at least 2020. Specifically when they told a documentarian he could film and then threatened litigation he release his film after he had already shot it. He had to blur literally everything at Burning Man but the guy he's following around.
https://www.blurringman.org/blurring-man https://www.blurringman.org/blurring-man
- jesse_dot_id 1mo agoZoinks I mangled that. Late edit: I've known this for awhile, since at least 2020. Specifically when they told a documentarian he could film and then threatened litigation if he released his film — after he had already shot it. He had to painstakingly blur literally all Burning Man footage except for the guy he's following around.
- gosub100 1mo agoIt's probably a liability from the nudity. Someone says "that's me! I didn't consent to my naked body being posted on the Internet!". Even if it was incidental, but if it was allowed, it would bring about a bunch of perverts a-la "girls done wild: burning man '26".