jemmons

10 ms·

1.
Custom Switch Matchers in Swift(figure.ink)
1 points by jemmons 12y ago|0 comments
2.
Private Methods and Properties in Swift(devblog.reverb.com)
1 points by jemmons 12y ago|0 comments
3.
by jemmons 15y ago
As one of the bloggers who criticized “The Daily” upon its release ( http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2184575 ) I felt compelled to say a few words on this... ...But it turned into a blog post: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=261891
4.
Excellent communities and “The Daily”(blog.fourstarstudios.com)
2 points by jemmons 15y ago|0 comments
5.
A new direction for digital comics?(doublefeaturecomics.com)
2 points by jemmons 15y ago|0 comments
6.
by jemmons 16y ago
Fixed. Very sorry.
7.
by jemmons 16y ago
Mea culpa. Like I said in the post, I'm not a blogger. I just threw some static html up not thinking of how it would interact with my site styles when needed to scroll. There's now a bit of UA sniffing in there that will display a simple te
8.
by jemmons 16y ago
FYI, an app submitted to the app store is available everywhere by default (there's an "everywhere" checkbox). If you want to limit its availability, you have to go in and specifically check the regions it'll be available in. So yeah, it's h
9.
Why "The Daily" is an Abomination (and how to fix it)(fourstarstudios.com)
38 points by jemmons 16y ago|30 comments
10.
by jemmons 16y ago
User: I think this feels laggy. Developer: No you don't. I have the benchmarks to prove it.
11.
by jemmons 16y ago
How about we compare the N1 (released Jan 5th, 2010) with the first gen iPhone (released June 29th, 2007)? Even the 2007 iPhone had smooth scrolling/compositing/animation and was always responsive to touch gestures. I'm pretty sure you can
12.
by jemmons 16y ago
Given employees of small service companies sometimes deal with clients more often than they deal with their own families, it's not unreasonable to posit these clients act as a "bubble" that insulates the company from the world at large. Wha
13.
by jemmons 16y ago
Hey! Ad-hominem the 37 signals if you must, but leave Chicago out of it!
14.
by jemmons 17y ago
Yes.
15.
by jemmons 17y ago
You're going to judge someone not by the merits of their arguments but by the topics which they've chosen to argue? That is a weak, disgusting, small-minded practice that has no place on HN. You should be ashamed.
16.
by jemmons 17y ago
Do you even know? Or are you really keen to make us guess?
17.
by jemmons 17y ago
I know we're not supposed to ding Android for the G1's faults. But it's been, what, over a year and a half since the OHA unveiled the platform? Doesn't Android deserve some blame for being an OS that, in 20 months, only one company has been
18.
by jemmons 17y ago
Old news. Like, January old: http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/palm-pres-wireless-charge... I'm not seeing what Palm's page adds to the conversation.
19.
by jemmons 17y ago
I read your article. I wish you'd have done my comment the same courtesy. You address none of my points. You haven't tried another cable. You haven't had the issue confirmed by support. You haven't tried with protected vs. unprotected conte
20.
by jemmons 17y ago
Mac users: don't forget ClickToFlash ( http://rentzsch.github.com/clicktoflash/ ) iPhone users: breath a sigh of relief that there's no Flash on your platform yet.
21.
by jemmons 17y ago
Kindle is just a book, pity since Kindle could be much more This seems to insinuate the last thing I should want from my eReader is for it to be highly focused on the one task I actually use it for. For my money, the opposite is true.
22.
by jemmons 17y ago
What I don't see here is any corroborating evidence that this is anything other than a bug or a faulty cable. Did the author call AppleCare? Did they tell him this was a DRM issue? Has he tried it with protected and unprotected content? Has
23.
by jemmons 17y ago
No.
24.
How Palm Re-Enabled iTunes Sync(precentral.net)
32 points by jemmons 17y ago|13 comments
25.
by jemmons 17y ago
1) You explicitly don't have the right to resell the electronic copy you licensed from Amazon. Therefore you do not get to set the price at which they "buy it back" (which is not what they're doing anyway. They're refunding you for a purcha
26.
by jemmons 17y ago
Maybe because it was Amazon's fault they sold the "illegal digital copy" in the first place Granted. But what are you really out? For them to provide absolutely full remuneration to you, they'd have to pay you 99¢ (which they did. Immed
27.
by jemmons 17y ago
Why on earth would you call shipping customers who bought a 99¢ illegal digital copy a $10 paperback "the least they could do"? I mean the question honestly. I'm wondering where this sense of entitlement comes from.
28.
by jemmons 17y ago
The 99¢ paid would only buy the first chapter of 1984. I'm not sure customers would appreciate getting what they paid for in this instance.
29.
by jemmons 17y ago
I admit I'm a very pro-capitalism type of guy and I indulge in many excesses that I should not take for granted, and yet do. But I absolutely refuse to feel anything but joy and elation when I consider the miraculous tools I have available
30.
by jemmons 17y ago
I've been using Logic since the Atari days, and I certainly don't mean to belittle the contributions of eMagic! I'm less familiar with the linage of Final Cut, but I'm sure whoever developed that before Apple did fantastic work. But, though

More ›